FFXIV Stormblood Benchmark Scores

[Fascinate]

4.7 ghz and better IPC...

Ah ya 900mhz will probably do that I think ryzen is close to haswell IPC but mine is at 3.8ghz.

Do you have 3d mark time spy? If not thats cool, but here is my score for that:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/20247887?

[Advent]

My CPU is OC'ed to 4.4

That might be it. Mine is only clocked at 4.2 or so. I can't remember, because I had some system instability at 4.4. Never tried to go any higher, which is a shame, since I have an AIO liquid cooler.

[pansertjald]

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Tested on: 03/06/2017 02:48:55
Score: 15070
Average Frame Rate: 102.562
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 2.096 sec
Scene #2 2.947 sec
Scene #3 2.565 sec
Scene #4 3.066 sec
Scene #5 5.632 sec
Scene #6 1.399 sec
Total Loading Time 17.708 sec

DAT:s20170603024855.dat

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Disabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Maximum
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
-Glare: Standard
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Quality
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled

System
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (6.2, build 9200) (15063.rs2_release.170317-1834)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6600K CPU @ 3.50GHz
16342.078MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (VRAM 8119 MB)

[Fascinate]

See thats weird, dude a page back got over 14000 with a 980. Your 1070 should be well above ~800 point lead.

Your score seems normal (3200 points above my 1060) but the 980 score seems off.

[Deleted]

See thats weird, dude a page back got over 14000 with a 980. Your 1070 should be well above ~800 point lead.

Your score seems normal (3200 points above my 1060) but the 980 score seems off.

The CPU itself has a lot to say when you hit the cap of which FFXIV can utilize on your GFX

[Fascinate]

The CPU itself has a lot to say when you hit the cap of which FFXIV can utilize on your GFX

Ya and i went over that above, its still not enough to make up for the kind of scores were talking about here. Also the guy above has a 6600k which is a faster CPU clock for clock, so if he has a mild overclock only that is comparable to the 980 score a page back. (a 1070 is a much faster card than a 980, his score should be well higher than only 800 point lead)

I also posted my 3d mark time spy score for reference, but the guy with the 980 didnt post his.

[aviger]

anyway one of you with a card comparable to a Titan X (not XP, but i think a 980ti/1060) could run this at 2560x1600 (i game at that reso with a 30inch monitor).
I don't have a sub atm for FF but might come back if the FPS is nice at highest settings

[Remilia]

The benchmark is free. Link at the bottom of the first post.

[Fascinate]

Try it with 1080p maximum fullscreen as settings.

As for overclocking you cant on your CPU, GPU overclocking these days is rarely worth it but can be easily done with msi afterburner or evga precision.

[Gorgodeus]

Your loading times are crap, double or more than everyone else. You either have a horrible drive or one that is not performing optimally.

[Fascinate]

I know you are talking to guy above but:
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 5.610 sec
Scene #2 4.589 sec
Scene #3 4.310 sec
Scene #4 5.895 sec
Scene #5 10.751 sec
Scene #6 2.125 sec
Total Loading Time 33.283 sec

This is a faster than the last time i ran it, each time it will get faster and faster due to hybrid hard drive. Disregarding scene 5 for whatever reason, its only ~2 seconds behind people's ssd's, for a fraction of price. This drive really impressed me.

[Fascinate]

how do I check for optimization and then fixing any faults if you dont mind?

First download seatools for windows and check for errors. Other than that not a ton you can do really, aside from a reformat or a new drive.

[Gorgodeus]

how do I check for optimization and then fixing any faults if you dont mind?

What exact drive is the game installed on? If it is on an HDD and not an SSD, it will have much longer loading times. If it is on an HDD, then the speed of the HDD (5400. 7200, etc)could also be a factor, and/or it could need defragging.

[Gorgodeus]

Yea it's on my HDD, will moving it to my SSD cut my loading times in half?

Possibly even faster than that, depending on the speed of the SSD.

[aviger]

The benchmark is free. Link at the bottom of the first post.

Wow how did i miss that heh, thanks.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Tested on: 6/2/2017 8:29:20 PM
Score: 9570
Average Frame Rate: 64.320
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 2.359 sec
Scene #2 3.013 sec
Scene #3 2.335 sec
Scene #4 3.289 sec
Scene #5 5.941 sec
Scene #6 1.378 sec
Total Loading Time 18.319 sec

DAT:s20170602202920.dat

Screen Size: 2560x1600
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Preset 1
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Disabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Maximum
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
-Glare: Standard
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Quality
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled

System
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (15063.rs2_release.170317-1834)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
32706.664MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X (VRAM 12244 MB)

This software does not guarantee that your system will run the Windows versions of FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn, FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward, and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2017 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.

Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 9570 2560x1600 Preset 1 DX11 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 9570 2560x1600 Preset 1 DirectX11 Full Screen NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 2560x1600 Preset 1 DirectX11 Score: 9570 Extremely High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 2560x1600 Preset 1 DirectX11 Full Screen Score: 9570
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Score: 9570 Extremely High
2560x1600 Preset 1 DirectX11 Full Screen
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV


And at 1080 (same settings)
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Tested on: 6/2/2017 8:38:57 PM
Score: 14517
Average Frame Rate: 100.478
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 2.302 sec
Scene #2 3.049 sec
Scene #3 2.397 sec
Scene #4 3.374 sec
Scene #5 5.999 sec
Scene #6 1.381 sec
Total Loading Time 18.503 sec

DAT:s20170602203857.dat

[Tiberria]

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Tested on: 6/3/2017 4:33:17 PM
Score: 14759
Average Frame Rate: 110.110
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 2.260 sec
Scene #2 2.928 sec
Scene #3 2.602 sec
Scene #4 3.160 sec
Scene #5 5.869 sec
Scene #6 1.590 sec
Total Loading Time 18.411 sec

DAT:s20170603163317.dat

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Windowed
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Disabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Maximum
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
-Glare: Standard
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Quality
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled

System
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (15063.rs2_release.170317-1834)
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor
16330.695MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (VRAM 11158 MB)

This software does not guarantee that your system will run the Windows versions of FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn, FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward, and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2017 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.

Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 14759 1920x1080 Maximum DX11 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 14759 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Windowed NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Score: 14759 Extremely High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Windowed Score: 14759
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Score: 14759 Extremely High
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Windowed
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV

- - - Updated - - -

It's actually pretty gross that i7 CPUs with 1070s are beating Ryzen CPUs with 1080 Tis.

[Fascinate]

This benchmark just does not like ryzen lol.

Something is definitely off, a guy with a gtx 980 almost beat your score (14,2xx). Same guy has a haswell cpu at 4.7ghz, they are very close in IPC id say identical, 700mhz isnt making the difference here its that the benchmark does recognize ryzen properly or something.

A 1080ti is at least 2x as fast as a 980, something not adding up here lol.

[pansertjald]

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Tested on: 6/3/2017 4:33:17 PM
Score: 14759
Average Frame Rate: 110.110
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 2.260 sec
Scene #2 2.928 sec
Scene #3 2.602 sec
Scene #4 3.160 sec
Scene #5 5.869 sec
Scene #6 1.590 sec
Total Loading Time 18.411 sec

DAT:s20170603163317.dat

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Windowed
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Disabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Maximum
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
-Glare: Standard
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Quality
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled

System
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (15063.rs2_release.170317-1834)
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor
16330.695MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (VRAM 11158 MB)

This software does not guarantee that your system will run the Windows versions of FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn, FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward, and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2017 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.

Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 14759 1920x1080 Maximum DX11 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 14759 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Windowed NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Score: 14759 Extremely High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Windowed Score: 14759
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Score: 14759 Extremely High
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Windowed
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV

- - - Updated - - -

It's actually pretty gross that i7 CPUs with 1070s are beating Ryzen CPUs with 1080 Tis.

My i5 with a 1070 is beating your Ryzen. My score is on second page

[Quixef]

Ok for a gaming laptop with a 1070 (lol had to remove FF14 links cos I could not post)


Tested on: 6/4/2017 12:08:06 AM
Score: 12332
Average Frame Rate: 87.853
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 2.151 sec
Scene #2 3.040 sec
Scene #3 2.467 sec
Scene #4 3.144 sec
Scene #5 5.862 sec
Scene #6 1.396 sec
Total Loading Time 18.063 sec


Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Disabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Maximum
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
-Glare: Standard
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: Quality
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled

System
Windows 10 Home Single Language 64-bit
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6820HK CPU 2.70GHz
32725.598MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (VRAM 8113 MB)


Share Results
Type 1
Score: 12332 1920x1080 Maximum DX11 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6820HK CPU 2.70GHz NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
Type 2
Score: 12332 1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Full Screen NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
Type 3
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Score: 12332 Extremely High
Type 4
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Full Screen Score: 12332
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Stormblood Benchmark
Score: 12332 Extremely High
1920x1080 Maximum DirectX11 Full Screen
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6820HK CPU 2.70GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

[Tiberria]

This benchmark just does not like ryzen lol.

Something is definitely off, a guy with a gtx 980 almost beat your score (14,2xx). Same guy has a haswell cpu at 4.7ghz, they are very close in IPC id say identical, 700mhz isnt making the difference here its that the benchmark does recognize ryzen properly or something.

A 1080ti is at least 2x as fast as a 980, something not adding up here lol.

And, looking at the CPU and GPU usage throughout the test, the GPU is typically sitting at 40-50% utilization, with a few spikes to 80%, and all CPU cores are at <50%.