One vs multiple Warfronts debate:
Remember
There was supposed to be multiple locations for Garrisons.
Quick thought on Warfronts:
As the focus of "the War" in later BfA tiers likely shifts away from "H vs A" to, say, Naga or Old Gods, could we see Warfronts that also aren't H vs A, but Player vs Bigger Bad?
Naga were a WC3 faction, after all.
This would also explain why they only announced Stromgarde, although I doubt this is the only H vs A Warfront.
But your duty to Azeroth is not yet complete. More is demanded of you... a price the living cannot pay.
#1 Hype-Thread Shitposter - Overlord of the Hypethread
BTW, here are the transcripts of the panels:
http://warcraft.blizzplanet.com/blog...el-transcripts
I scanned through all of them. Not seeing "we are going to have only one warfront on launch" anywhere. Only "our first warfront is going to be Stromgarde".
It's OK to change plans and it's understandable that there are sometimes overpromises.
What's not OK is presenting an expansion that is laughably dry on new things and then having the "ooooops, there was a failure of communication (in reality: a bit of a deception / overpromise)" occur to one out of only two new things.
That's why this is important. If it was something like "yeah, apparently we said there will be multiple variations of challenge modes for instances in MoP, we screwed up, guys, and there will be only one variation with the timer", it would have been a non-event.
I miss when games and software came in boxes. There's a real art I can appreciate in making pleasing packaging that I think is understated to much
So... 7.3.5 is gonna go Life after Antorus ? That does means that the raid is actualy ready right now ?
I AM MY SCARS!-Illidan, Legion.