1. #17921
    Quote Originally Posted by Fahrad Wagner View Post
    We're sooooo reaching 1250 pages at least before Blizzcon.
    And we have vaguest idea of xpac at best. Well perhaps not that vague but still..

  2. #17922
    Quote Originally Posted by Lahis View Post
    For Pandaren I have no ideas, but do Subraces need to be a balanced act?
    Pandaren are the latest race, so they could be low-priority like Goblins and Worgen are for the HD overhaul. Or this could be satisfied with more customization options, mostly more fur colors and maybe some slight body type modifications. There aren't many "clans" for Pandaren, even the PC ones as inhabitants of the Wandering Isle are still identical to "mainland" Pandaren.
    But your duty to Azeroth is not yet complete. More is demanded of you... a price the living cannot pay.

  3. #17923
    Quote Originally Posted by Nathanyel View Post
    Pandaren are the latest race, so they could be low-priority like Goblins and Worgen are for the HD overhaul. Or this could be satisfied with more customization options, mostly more fur colors and maybe some slight body type modifications. There aren't many "clans" for Pandaren, even the PC ones as inhabitants of the Wandering Isle are still identical to "mainland" Pandaren.
    See... This is why I say sub-races is a BARBER SHOP caliber update that could just as easily be added alongside a new class or a new race. How is anything you are describing more substantial than us suddenly having been able to change our hair styles and getting a crap ton new styles? AS WELL AS DK

  4. #17924
    Quote Originally Posted by NovaFirefall View Post
    That absolutely does NOT parallel.

    The visually updated models took the existing races and COMPLETELY overhauled them, they went from having just a few polygons for faces with textures as features to fully realized and expressive.

    While on the other hand the "sub-races" most everyone seem to covet so greatly exist as "Dark Iron/Wildhammer" or "Taunka/Highmountain" or "Brown/Dragonmaw" for orcs. My point being that most ALL of these exist in large part in the game already. They would only really need to add a couple more options on top of what's already here or even just do a recolor job on what we have.

    How can you even remotely think they are even close to the same?
    Because while Dark Iron dwarves are just dwarves with a dark skin and red eyes, taunka are quite different from tauren. The amount of customization that they would have to add to make some of these subraces available is easily comparable to the model revamp in the amount of assets they'd have to create.

    Think about it this way, if they add forest trolls, that's a completely new bodytype for male and female trolls. Sure they'd use the same skeleton, but the model itself would be completely different.

    Customization would grow exponentially with those as they'd have to add several options to all the new features. So while it's not as much work for animators as the model revamp was, it's as much work, if not more, for model and texture artists.

  5. #17925
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulwind View Post
    Because while Dark Iron dwarves are just dwarves with a dark skin and red eyes, taunka are quite different from tauren. The amount of customization that they would have to add to make some of these subraces available is easily comparable to the model revamp in the amount of assets they'd have to create.

    Think about it this way, if they add forest trolls, that's a completely new bodytype for male and female trolls. Sure they'd use the same skeleton, but the model itself would be completely different.

    Customization would grow exponentially with those as they'd have to add several options to all the new features. So while it's not as much work for animators as the model revamp was, it's as much work, if not more, for model and texture artists.
    My opposition to this point is a simple one... Mostly that it kind of isn't fair that while trolls and such lucky races would get extravagant new models that borderline function as an entirely new race... Everyone only really suggests "some more customization" for other races like pandaren.

    It kind of blows up the already unbalanced sub-race argument that some races would get wildly superior options.

  6. #17926
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadochi View Post
    Wasn't page 900 only yesterday? I know it wont be 50 pages every day, but still is some really fast moving. And Blizzcon week is gonna be littered with leaks moreso than Gamescom week.
    Indeed! The hypetrain is going into hyperspaaaaaace moooooode.

  7. #17927
    Quote Originally Posted by NovaFirefall View Post
    See... This is why I say sub-races is a BARBER SHOP caliber update that could just as easily be added alongside a new class or a new race. How is anything you are describing more substantial than us suddenly having been able to change our hair styles and getting a crap ton new styles? AS WELL AS DK
    Player perception is the key here, though, even if subraces are less work than a completely new race, they will have comparable success. It's cosmetic gameplay-wise, but offers a lot more opportunity for identification with your character.
    But your duty to Azeroth is not yet complete. More is demanded of you... a price the living cannot pay.

  8. #17928
    Quote Originally Posted by Nathanyel View Post
    Player perception is the key here, though, even if subraces are less work than a completely new race, they will have comparable success. It's cosmetic gameplay-wise, but offers a lot more opportunity for identification with your character.
    You seem to misunderstand me completely.

    I am in no way AGAINST sub-races, in fact I'd very much love it if they added them.

    My issue is I feel they could just as easily market it as a secondary feature like the Barber Shop and still add a new race or class.

  9. #17929
    Quote Originally Posted by NovaFirefall View Post
    Everyone only really suggests "some more customization" for other races like pandaren.
    Oh I'm not against "true" subraces for Pandaren, but I myself just can't think of a good one. Doesn't mean no one else can do that.

    Quote Originally Posted by NovaFirefall View Post
    My issue is I feel they could just as easily market it as a secondary feature like the Barber Shop and still add a new race or class.
    Of course. That's best-case, though. Tradeoffs aren't exactly new to WoW. I would accept "just subraces" as a substitute for a new race, but I understand if others don't see it that way.
    But your duty to Azeroth is not yet complete. More is demanded of you... a price the living cannot pay.

  10. #17930
    Quote Originally Posted by NovaFirefall View Post
    My opposition to this point is a simple one... Mostly that it kind of isn't fair that while trolls and such lucky races would get extravagant new models that borderline function as an entirely new race... Everyone only really suggests "some more customization" for other races like pandaren.

    It kind of blows up the already unbalanced sub-race argument that some races would get wildly superior options.
    I've suggested Tortollan as a "subrace" for Pandaren. Similar silhouette, compatible skeleton (except for the face), completely different model.

    Also, what are they going to do, come up with new kinds of dwaves and orcs just to match the customization of trolls or nightborne, they'll have to work with what they have in the lore.

  11. #17931
    Quote Originally Posted by Nathanyel View Post
    Oh I'm not against "true" subraces for Pandaren, but I myself just can't think of a good one. Doesn't mean no one else can do that.



    Of course. That's best-case, though. Tradeoffs aren't exactly new to WoW. I would accept "just subraces" as a substitute for a new race, but I understand if others don't see it that way.
    Mists of Pandaria was pretty great, we got Monk AND Pandaren.

    I simply cannot understand why so many seem to be content asking for LESS. I'm all for managing expectations and what not... But I think we should make it know we want things, not that we would just "accept" getting a lesser feature if it's one we particularly like.

  12. #17932
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulwind View Post
    I've suggested Tortollan as a "subrace" for Pandaren. Similar silhouette, compatible skeleton (except for the face), completely different model.

    Also, what are they going to do, come up with new kinds of dwaves and orcs just to match the customization of trolls or nightborne.
    If tortollans make it into WoW, I'd be very happy! Those little turtles are so cuuuuute.

  13. #17933
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulwind View Post
    I've suggested Tortollan as a "subrace" for Pandaren. Similar silhouette, compatible skeleton (except for the face), completely different model.

    Also, what are they going to do, come up with new kinds of dwaves and orcs just to match the customization of trolls or nightborne, they'll have to work with what they have in the lore.
    tortollan are cannon to HS right?

  14. #17934
    Quote Originally Posted by Saphano View Post
    tortollan are cannon to HS right?
    Yes to Hearthstone only as for the moment.

  15. #17935
    Scarab Lord
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    In the same urn as Vol'Jin
    Posts
    4,629
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadochi View Post
    I have links to most of the leaks saved up, with some keywords. So I'll maybe make a stat graph of how many leaks guessed which aspect.
    That'd be jolly good fun. Let me know if you need any help.

  16. #17936
    Deleted
    Spontaneous thought: how cool would it be if the expansion was absolutely wild? Like... World of Warcraft: Age of Dragons. We venture to Kul Tiras and/or Zandalar before going into the unknown on the Dragon Isles, a completely primeval place with ancient ruins. Once there, in the jungle, we discover the hope for the future of the dragon race. Clutches of fresh and untainted eggs for every brood. Ancient temples which speak of the past of their kind. Traces of an forlorn war between Old Gods and Dragons. Azshara and the naga are there, and there are pockets of void corruption as well. But mainly the theme is basically King Kong on steroids.

  17. #17937
    The Patient KingSapmi's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Far north in Norway!
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by JainaKulTirasBlizzCon View Post
    Spontaneous thought: how cool would it be if the expansion was absolutely wild? Like... World of Warcraft: Age of Dragons. We venture to Kul Tiras and/or Zandalar before going into the unknown on the Dragon Isles, a completely primeval place with ancient ruins. Once there, in the jungle, we discover the hope for the future of the dragon race. Clutches of fresh and untainted eggs for every brood. Ancient temples which speak of the past of their kind. Traces of an forlorn war between Old Gods and Dragons. Azshara and the naga are there, and there are pockets of void corruption as well. But mainly the theme is basically King Kong on steroids.
    Sounds like Mists of Pandaria, with a bigger purpose. I loved MoP, I would be down with this idea.
    Ryzen 3600X | MSI MPG X570 Gaming Edge Wi-fi | 16GB G.Skill FlareX 3200MHz | Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 XT Pulse | EVGA SuperNOVA 750W G3 Gold | NZXT Kraken X62 | 2TB Samsung 860 EVO | 1TB Samsung 860 EVO | 500GB Samsung 970 NVMe M.2 | 3x 27" HP Omen 165Hz 1Ms Latency

  18. #17938
    The Lightbringer
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    3,235
    Ethereals for the both factions are more beliveable. They are pretty neutral race so it would fit both Horde and Alliance.
    And it would be funny if none of the leaks would be confirmed and we will get full new Karesh planet, with couple nods to South Seas vibe.

  19. #17939
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulwind View Post
    I've suggested Tortollan as a "subrace" for Pandaren. Similar silhouette, compatible skeleton (except for the face), completely different model.

    Also, what are they going to do, come up with new kinds of dwaves and orcs just to match the customization of trolls or nightborne, they'll have to work with what they have in the lore.
    Earthen would be pretty obvious subrace for Dwarves.

  20. #17940
    The Insane Raetary's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Base Camp
    Posts
    19,191
    Quote Originally Posted by Fummockelchen View Post
    and DHs are Elves, not demons....
    Because all elves have demon souls.


    Formerly known as Arafal

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •