Child refugees who become Swedes cannot reunite with family

[Zython]

I said Australia is one of the most generous, not the most. Words are important.

*Looks at the graph again*

Clearly they aren't to you.

I can't believe you just said that. The left has no shame.

What do I have to be ashamed of? I'm not the one defending concentration camps.

No don't go quoting left wing propaganda rags at me, unless you are prepared to believe Breitbart or the like.

"If you trust a center-left source, you HAVE to be willing to believe neo-Nazi websites. Because reasons."

Don't take my word for it. Look it up.

It's your job to provide your sources, not mine.

Offshore processing has proven to be a successful deterrent and is policy for both the left and right side of politics. It saves lives.

But you haven't explained why the torture is necessary.

Plus I like how you edit out my comment that they are free to leave at any time. It's an important point that doesn't suit your ill informed narrative.

Because you didn't substantiate that claim.

They literally have to pass India, Singapore, Indonesia and Papua new Guinea to get to us on their leaking boats. Do you not know where Australia is on the globe?

*Looks at the political climate in those places*

Yeah..."safe".

wtf....

You heard me.

[Super Kami Dende]

So why does Australia torture them?

I know right, our government should just leave them floating at Sea until they drown or starve. Much more humane.

[Zoranon]

Hysteric theatrics

I gotta give it to you man, you are playing the role of a hysteric progressive pretty well. Well I hope you are only playing it because otherwise...

But i think the claim that Singapore is not safe is a proof you are just shit-posting and not actually serious.

[Xarkan]

But you haven't explained why the torture is necessary.

It is not..

But off shore processing (and actual processing, not just camps to prevent them crossing but places where actual refugees still can get send on) seem a necessity. If there for example were EU run factilities in.. Libya that could do the vetting we might be able to avoid deaths at sea. Assuming we could make the camps work and could send those that tried by boat to vetting in the camps

Not sure how, in the example, to get Libya to agree to such a thing but thousands are dying that really shouldnt

[Zython]

I know right, our government should just leave them floating at Sea until they drown or starve. Much more humane.

There are other options, you know.

- - - Updated - - -

It is not..

But

Yeah, you really should have stopped here.

- - - Updated - - -

I gotta give it to you man, you are playing the role of a hysteric progressive pretty well. Well I hope you are only playing it because otherwise...

But i think the claim that Singapore is not safe is a proof you are just shit-posting and not actually serious.

Maybe you should consider why you consider basic morality to be "hysteric theatrics"?

[Torto]

I gotta give it to you man, you are playing the role of a hysteric progressive pretty well. Well I hope you are only playing it because otherwise...

But i think the claim that Singapore is not safe is a proof you are just shit-posting and not actually serious.

Yeah I've just come to the same conclusion and I'm a bit embarrassed I got trolled.

[Zython]

Yeah I've just come to the same conclusion and I'm a bit embarrassed I got trolled.

If you don't have any proof for your claims, the correct thing to do is admit that you're wrong. It's OK, lots of people are wrong. I mean, people other than me.

[Zoranon]

If you don't have any proof for your claims, the correct thing to do is admit that you're wrong. It's OK, lots of people are wrong. I mean, people other than me.

Yeah I believe this post to be the conclusive evidence that mr. Zython is not serious.

[Zython]

Yeah I believe this post to be the conclusive evidence that mr. Zython is not serious.

What have I said that is factually false?

Edit: Literally, all I've done is say that putting people into camps to be tortured is bad, ask for citations, and provided my own. That's it. If this offends you, well, you probably shouldn't be here.

[Super Kami Dende]

There are other options, you know.

Name one that isn't "OMG JUST TAKE THEM IN" or that doesn't require a Country that doesn't want them paying for them in some way.

[Zoranon]

What have I said that is factually false?

Well for example your claim that Singapore is not safe. Many other things aswell.

And your claim that others can be wrong but not you is just a cherry on top.

[Zython]

Well for example your claim that Singapore is not safe.

Do you have proof it is?

Many other things aswell.

Such as?

And your claim that others can be wrong but not you is just a cherry on top.

Well, if I've been wrong, you seem to have a very difficult time giving an example.

- - - Updated - - -

Name one that isn't "OMG JUST TAKE THEM IN" or that doesn't require a Country that doesn't want them paying for them in some way.

Well, for starters, you could NOT torture them.

Hmm?
Hmm?

[Zoranon]

Do you have proof it is?



Such as?



Well, if I've been wrong, you seem to have a very difficult time giving an example.

- - - Updated - - -



Well, for starters, you could NOT torture them.

Hmm?
Hmm?

Thats not how it works cupcake, you make a claim some country is not safe, you prove it.

This applies to all the countries you have claimed are not safe.

And no, articles from rags such as guardian are not proof.

[Xarkan]

Well for example your claim that Singapore is not safe. Many other things aswell.

Is it not like the 2nd most densely populated state in the world? Is that a place you think refugees should be send to?

(no 3 on this list http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/...high_desc=true but macao sar i choose to ignore here)

[Zython]

Thats not how it works cupcake, you make a claim some country is not safe, you prove it.

So I have to provide all the sources, while you don't have to provide any?

Maybe there's a reason you hold me to a higher standard than you hold yourself to?

And no, articles from rags such as guardian are not proof.

So you want me to provide proof, but only proof that validates your preexisting notions? That seems...dumb.

[Super Kami Dende]

Well, for starters, you could NOT torture them.

SO you completely avoided the question and went back to hyperbole. Lol ok seems you are worthless when it comes to actual non-outrage debate.

[Zython]

SO you completely avoided the question and went back to hyperbole. Lol ok seems you are worthless when it comes to actual non-outrage debate.

Oh, I get the problem. You're offended by facts.

Sorry, snowflake, facts don't care about your feelings.

Edit: Being outraged at human rights abuses is a good thing. Again, facts don't care about your feelings, cuck.

[Bakis]

Good, tired of the bullshit of 'anhöriginvandring', bring their freaking entire extended family.

[Zoranon]

So I have to provide all the sources, while you don't have to provide any?

Maybe there's a reason you hold me to a higher standard than you hold yourself to?



So you want me to provide proof, but only proof that validates your preexisting notions? That seems...dumb.

This is debating 101 matey, you make a claim, you provide a proof of said claim from an unbiased source, which guardian is not. This is trivial stuff, but then again I think you know all this, but you have decided to shit post for some reason.

[Xarkan]

Oh, I get the problem. You're offended by facts.

Sorry, snowflake, facts don't care about your feelings.

Edit: Being outraged at human rights abuses is a good thing. Again, facts don't care about your feelings, cuck.

Apros pros naurus

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politi...30-gr4y8g.html

If there was nothing wrong they could've shown there was nothing wrong