Originally Posted by
Dacien
Not true.
The Steele dossier was compiled entirely by Christopher Steele's own humint starting in June 2016, during which time Hillary and the DNC were paying the bills.
A conservative group hired Fusion GPS to begin oppo research into Trump, but after they dropped Fusion GPS, and Hillary and the DNC picked them up, Fusion hired Steele, who then went on to produce his dossier. There is no connection between the dossier and any conservative group.
Now, if Steele had been hired by Fusion GPS while being funded by conservatives, then the conservatives dropped Fusion and Hillary and the DNC picked them back up, then your claim would have merit.
Alternatively, if the Steele dossier contained intel that was gathered while conservatives were paying the bills, then you'd be on solid ground as well with your claim. But we know the Steele dossier was comprised entirely of his intelligence gathering "reports" starting in June 2016.
It would be like Group A hiring a law firm to sue someone, and then dropping the lawsuit, and then Group B hires the same law firm to sue the same guy, and produces new evidence. It would not be accurate to say that Group A was originally behind the new evidence simply because they used the same law firm targeting the same guy. Fusion GPS had many diverse clients, they even had associates offering dirt on Hillary to members of the Trump team at the same time they were employed by Hillary to dig up dirt on Trump.