Originally Posted by
Wildberry
And racism wasn't the driving factor leading to the "genocide" of the Darkspear.
That's not genocide, actually. You don't get to throw an arbitrary identifier onto a racial group, such as "veteran," and claim that because they were put at increased risk, they were genocided.
Was that genocide? There were still plenty of Blood/High Elves in Quel'thalas.
Valeera? You mean Vereesa? The one that belongs to the same racial group as those Blood Elves albeit with a different political stance? What a genocide!
Vol'jin could have made it out of that alive, had he not expressed disagreement with Garrosh's plans, "War Crimes" literally shows us the dialogue between Garrosh and Bloodrazor. Given that Vol'jin had already made threats of assassination and treason, and attended numerous "anti-Garrosh" meetings in secret, Garrosh was well within his right as Vol'jin's legitimate sovereign to order such an execution. Even Vol'jin states that the penalty for treason is death ("War Crimes").
The Darkspear Rebellion started after that. Regardless of what happened to Vol'jin, though, the Darkspear were still obligated to follow Garrosh (The Blood Oath states: "I give my flesh and blood freely to the Warchief").
Really though, to step back from specific examples, you seem to have two problems here:
A.) You're using the term genocide too loosely
B.) You're incorrectly assuming racism is the driving force behind these actions
No, segregation is not a big deal. Barring people of certain races from entering or occupying certain establishments, areas or districts doesn't do any physical harm to them. It's a restriction of their freedom, sure, but said freedom is granted by the state anyway, so any segregated group (especially within the Horde), can't claim rights against the state.