asking for a change in model got you void elves.
Anemo: traveler, Sucrose
Pyro: Yanfei, Amber, diluc, xiangling, thoma, Xinyan, Bennett
Geo: Noelle, Ningguang, Yun Jin, Gorou
Hydro: Barbara, Zingqiu, Ayato
Cyro: Shenhe, Kaeya, Chongyun, Diona, Ayaka, Rosaria
Electro: Fischl, Lisa, Miko, Kujou, Raiden, Razor
Blizzard making a mistake in their eyes, and then attempting to not make that mistake again is bad logic to you? All because they didn't remove their mistake from the game?
A mistake that a percentage of the players still enjoy? That will have repercussions if that content is cleansed from the game? Should content ever be cut from the game?
lmfaooooooooo okay
No my response to you was for you to understand that your statements were in fact opinions. Get over yourself.
"My opinion is fact!!!!!!!"
As i said before turning to allies of other races vs doing mostly on your own.
Annd since when has the horde been purely about morals see the forsaken. If anything this would cement be as being a true horde race and even explain further their connection with the forsaken as a do anything to survive group
Give void elves more natural skin colour and everything would be okay.
Hahaha good one, never heard that one. you know why people like rpgs? Because they want to be immersed into characters they create. After years of knowing warcraft strategies and races they saw in this universe. Would they create character of established race or race they never heard of?
It's the same thing. The races have narratives just as much as the entire Horde and Alliance have narratives. We've seen them time and time again.
What makes this important by comparison is that this is the only scenario where a single race is split between both factions. Blizzard needs to treat both sides with delicate care.
I think that the people who see it as "a better choice" are kinda the one projecting their own fears. I mean that choice that split them, is really just a choice of idealism vs pragmatism. You can argue that no choice is truly right, it depends on the eye of the beholder.
Each choice does have consequences. High Elves that didn't go through with Blood Elves lost their home and lands, and possibly families in the process. They gained Alliance friendship sure, but still there was consequence to that choice.
Blood Elves on the turn around had consequences as well, they lost favor with their Alliance allies and also possibly HE family members, but then again gained the Horde in the process and got to keep their lands and home.
I think one can always come up with good arguments on either side of idealism vs pragmatism. Indeed these high elf/blood elf debates are evidence of that, not the playability focus but back when people were debating the lore differences between the two.
I mean now you could say a total 180 of the playable Blood Elves isn't an interesting dynamic to have playable, but I personally think it is.
And on the Fel thing, I mean the newest chronicles mentions that Blood Elves did Fel siphoning. Not the old lore of "oh they just used fel-powered structures and that seeped into their eyes" so regardless of how this entire topic turned out. The newest lore does say they actually Fel siphoned and how it affected their mind, body, and soul. Does it not? o.o
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but you're saying that the High Elves were able to get support from the Alliance, while the Blood Elves had no one? Isn't that kind of strange? It seems like you're saying here that the Alliance were better friends than the Horde, so the Blood Elves had to fend for themselves. That would be just explaining the difference by saying that the Alliance is morally superior. There's no complexity to the story, the implication is just A > B.
To make the story interesting, overcoming the addiction has to have a price. Otherwise, it will just boil down to a demonstration of how High Elves are better than Blood Elves, or how the Alliance is better than the Horde. That kind of story isn't going to pass the quality test.
How does it not make sense in the lore though?
They are all over the place, truly few things say "Alliance" as much as high elves. It's extremely integral to the faction's identity imo.
It'd be like the old crew has all finally come back together, Humans, Dwarves, Gnomes and High Elves, isn't that nice and wholesome?
They never said they loved working on High Elf designs.
Had that been said it would have been shoved into every single topic on this debate since then.
Please provide a source for that comment that they loved working on High Elf designs. If you cannot, you have imagined it.
Ion really did make an off hand comment regarding High Elves in 2014, that did happen. However, look what happened after he sat down to think the sub-race system through.
we are talking about how high elves would be bulkier than blood elves, and that don't make any sense in lore
even more if you use the justification of "no magic"
the race who barely make part of the alliance don't "scream alliance, and don't make part of the faction more than others, maybe in the time of lordaeron, but that time is long lostThey are all over the place, truly few things say "Alliance" as much as high elves. It's extremely integral to the faction's identity imo.
sincerely, no, it would not, another tolkien cliche of elf+human+dwarfs is not nice and wholesomeisn't that nice and wholesome?
elves left the alliance and joined the horde, thats the "new" lore, set in stone back in the frozen throne campaign and thats ok,we don't need to dismiss that,
focus the void elves and forget/kill t high elves left, or set then to maybe bring half elves in a future
Last edited by Syegfryed; 2018-04-29 at 09:22 PM.
slight modidications make no sense in lore? i see you didnt see how hafthor bjornson became kul tiran human in 6 years.
Why wouldnt vegetarian high elf look skinnier than his blood elven brother?
still dont know why do you insist on that we want them bulkier, whatever is more convenient, i would take it
Last edited by mmoc09bcb5d61f; 2018-04-29 at 09:25 PM.