If you keep saying lying and accusing me publicly about things I didn't do, I'll keep answering you publicly, as you seem to be willing to keep embarrassing yourself. I tried to handle this discussion friendly and politely since the very beginning, but you've been elitist, totalitarian and a terrible shameless liar. You caused me of saying things I didn't say, and I proved it by quoting my own words, and you still are not able to admit you've been wrong the whole time and that you lied about that. You can't even answer to that. You keep slandering in each of your posts. Thus you get the serious-toned answers. Still, not impolite, or full conceptual mistakes or full of lies as yours.
Wake up. You didn't show anything, you didn't prove anything. You are stuck in a blabbing circle of which you seem not to be able to go out. You are misusing words, concepts, the lore of the game and you can't refute my thesis. So, yeah, you are wrong.
Clearly, again, you don't know what a fact is, neither a falsehood. Again, you're not giving any argument, any prove, just nothing. Zero. Again. Still blablaing and circling around.
"Not at all" means you yourself are admitting that it has different meanings.
You don't know what a pragmatical-linguistical context is, you don't know what semantics are, please, stop, stop. Don't try to keep arguing about the things you don't know. Stop bringing that up. I am not arguing semantics with you because you don't know about it. It would be like arguing with you about harassment, politeness or genetics. It wouldn't make any sense.
And again, lying. Go and check the first time I quoted you. I didn't start anything talking about your wrong use of the word rebrand and its concept. I started pointing your hypocritical criterion, by differentiating the Blood Elves and the High Elves but not the Huojin Pandaren and the Tushui Pandaren. Then I offered you a thesis, which you still haven't been able to refute, and therefore you keep circling around, slandering, repeating that I lied -when you've been proven that it wasn't true more than once- and repeating that I only argue about semantics, when you don't have a clue about what the semantics are. I corrected you in the use of a word of which you didn't know the meaning and in the misspelling of a latinisms if which you also didn't know the meaning. That's not the subject of semantics. Add semantics to you have-to-check-in-the-dictionary list.
Irrelevant to you because you don't have, as usual, a single valid argument against that. It is relevant as you are confusing concepts. If you use rebrand, then you are referring to the same race, but to different organization of the same race. So, okay, Blood Elves and High Elves are the same race, right, perfect. About the semantics stuff -wow, again- read above.
Circling around. Again. Saying that you answered a question but not doing it doesn't work as an answer. In other words: you didn't answer anything.
Nope. Sorry. I am talking about you, and what you keep doing. You are not giving a single valid argument. You keep repeating trivial stuff, not answering to any question, not refuting my thesis and thinking that that strategy will work. It won't. By the way, what you are doing is a pretty good example of the ad nauseam fallacy.
I've been polite. And, if you remembered, I was polite since the very beginning with you. But you've been just annoying during the whole conversation, slandering again and again. So I got bored of you. Thus I am talking in a more serious tone. Also, read what I said at first about me being polite. I am always polite, but if you lie to me and lie about what I said, don't expect the same level of politeness. Just read the complete sentences.
Again, lying. You've been literally proven and shown in my last post how that isn't true. I didn't do that what you are stating.
?
Like, what do you mean by linking those sentence to full posts with more than 10 sentences? Again, circling around, blabbing, not being able to give a single valid argument during the whole conversation.
Just go back and read that sentence again:
"They call the pandaren"
"Who are "they"?"
"go to any NPC that addresses..."
Hence: question answered in the very same quote.
Once again, you're not acting in the a "polite person" would. But, anyways:?
Like, what do you mean by linking those sentence to full posts with more than 10 sentences? Again, circling around, blabbing, not being able to give a single valid argument during the whole conversation.
And this is where I stop responding to this since this conversation has whole wholly off-topic.
"Torturing someone is not an evil thing to do if it is done for good reasons" by Varodoc
"You sit in OG/SW waiting on a Mythic+ queue" by Altmer <- Oh, the pearls in this forum...
"They sort of did this Dragonriding, which ushered in the Dracthyr race." by Teriz <- the BS some people reach for their narratives...
Are the servers up yet? Anything for the real High Elves yet? Non-tentacle hairs? New hair colors?
Not fan art(sorry to disappoint), but this is my Blood Elf atm:
https://www.youtube.com/@DoffenGG
Mostly World of Warcraft stuff
For the moment we can only speculate with what is in the builds.
MrGM had discovered a new texture "braids" for the void elf hair.
Maybe there will be an option to display braids in place of the tentacles. <3
https://twitter.com/MrGMYT/status/1268276998947983363
For the new hair colors, there is still nothing to confirm.
Truly I don't know! I realized it was there in some of my model editing projects, but only on males! What is also very interesting is that VE and Kult tiran Hair textures are the same, just different colors: Indeed, a lot of races use the same hair/braid base in different hues, with stuff like ties/bindings changing.
Haven't been in this thread in a while.
Are helfers still in denial that light skinned velves are "high elves".
If they are then that just proves Obelisk and every other anti helfer right in that "high elves" have been playable since TBC and all these "I want mah alliance high elves not blood elves and their magic addiction blah blah blah" request pointless and whiny.
The Alliance gets the Horde's most popular race. The Horde should get the Alliance's most popular race in return. Alteraci Humans for the Horde!
I make Warcraft 3 Reforged HD custom models and I'm also an HD model reviewer.
Lore-wise, the non void skinned Void Elves are still just void elves. Which are originally Blood Elves, mutated by void energies.
Of course the Blood Elves are still actually High Elves biologically, since their division is cultural.
Biological High Elves have indeed been playable since TBC. But that misses the point entirely, being that people want to play the High Elves that separate themselves from their former Blood Elven kin due to their cultural division.
Arguably, from a lore standpoint, void elves even with their new skin tones are not High Elves.
Due to the fact that they are more biologically different from High Elves than even the Blood Elves are.
And also due to the fact that we have yet to be shown Void Elves following, or embracing the same culture as modern High Elves.
So, no non void skinned Void Elves are not High Elves, by lore.
But that's the amazing part of playing a Role Playing Game.
It's completely up to you, how you choose to Role Play your character, and if other people take issue with that, why do you want to interact with them in the first place?
Last edited by Yavi Dawnsong; 2020-06-26 at 04:26 PM. Reason: Missed a word lol
This change means that Void elves are now both a faction and a race - and those aren't exactly the same thing. The faction has high elves, blood elves and racial void elves - they are all part of the "void elves" even though some are racially high/blood elves. And then the purple ones are racial void elves.
So you can be a high elf void elf - you're not technically void elf racially until you get altered, so if you're not altered, you're a blood elf or high elf that's joined the cause, you're still racially a high elf, not a void elf.
Void elves are like Nightborne - they're magically altered versions of the blood elves and the night elves - key idetnitifiers
Void elf - skin colour change, eye colour change
Nightborne - body weight change, ear tip change
Light skinned "void" elves are not racially void elves, their faction void elves but racially high elves.
What we have here is race void elf, faction void elf. A high elf and blood elf can join the void elf faction, but only the purple ones are racially void elves.
So a void elf faction aligned high elf or void elf will use void elf racials because they're training with the void .
IMO seems like an oversight; like they didn't thought they were going to use any braid textures but still made them, but only updated the female ones to reflect the decision back when.
oh BTW, do the HE NPC's in alpha right now still have the pruple eyes, or are they gone to blue?
- - - Updated - - -
But I think there is actually an universe issue that could use explanation; are we getting new VE's from somewhere? Cause if HE's (such as the Wayfarers) are becoming VE's, then they are High Elves in the relevant sense; the biggest issue with Void Elves isn't that they are named that or use Void; is that they are culturally and ideologically blood elves, so if new VE's can be of HE origin, then that actually resolves the background lore issue for a lot.
Arguably, from a lore standpoint, it's not the kind of power they use what defines HE's, and "Void Elf" means little in terms of category to the ideological difference that make High Elves their own entity within alliance lore. It really doesn't matter -for many- that they are now Void Elves, as long as it is recognized they come from an Alliance High Elf background and not exclusively a Blood Elven one.