They can't even keep track of their own story. Their writing is inconsistent and illogical at multiple steps. They can't develop more than a handful of characters at once. They are ruled by rule of kewl. I have problems with none of these.
Even that aside, if your argument is that Blizzard's professional writers are probably better at writing a story than someone who's not a professional writer, then it's not exactly the great retort you thought it to be, let alone defense of Blizzard. Or a valid dismissal of criticism of their writing quality (unless you think one needs to be a chef to recognize a bad meal, in which case lel). As such, what you just put out there is an utterly worthless remark. And your white knighting needs a lot of work.
Instead of derailing this thread with internal forum drama or who is or isn't angry at who let's return to the actual topic at hand.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Thrall handed Warchief over to Garrosh, thinking he would be reliable in combating the Alliance and preserving honor. In the end he only combated the Alliance and disgraced the horde's honor. Vol'jin became Warchief after getting aid from both factions to overthrow Garrosh, while attempting to uphold honor for the horde. There was no need to combat the Alliance during this era since Garrosh was doing it anyway. Vol'jin handed over Warchief status on his deathbed (throne) to Sylvanas, not because of upholding honor or combating the Alliance, but out of desperation. No one else made a swift decision to save the horde leaders from getting killed off on the broken shores except her, which Vol'jin thought shes likely to make more similar decisions in the unforeseen future...unfortunately that doesn't seem to be the case leading into BfA.
Sure theres more qualified characters to be Warchief, but desperate times calls for desperate decisions, and you sure as hell can't just give up that role to someone else after the legion's defeat. Thats just bad writing and would make the Warchief look weak. But no matter how much you hate Sylvanas, won't change the fact that shes here to stay.
I want to upvote this just for the name "Blanduin" which somehow I have never heard up until now. /10char!
And I agree that Bain has been poorly portrayed in the game; he's not near the leader his father was. I kind of wish he had been the one to fight Garrosh to the death back in Cata, giving Cairn the motivation to spearhead the rebellion against him in Mists. Bain is too weak to be a good representative of the Tauren.
Because it sucks to have our leaders killed off all the time for the sake of a faction war that makes no sense.
Because your faction leader is effectively the mascot of your faction. In a game where faction pride is a significant portion of emotional investment, changing mascots is unsettling and can take years to really set in - just in time for the next mascot change.
I'll tell you how I feel about Sylvanas in 4 years.