Back on topic, I know you are too intelligent, too woke and too smart to think about that, but, pray tell, how do you plan to actually prosecute those ''GUNGS OF MOZLEMS RAPISTS'' that are so prevalent in your worldview ? (Especially for the edgelords suggesting that according to them, rape is not prosecutable when there are just one witness, the victim)
See, French sex crimes laws, like German ones, are still based on ''rape=maiden kidnapped from Sunday school and held at gunpoint by brigands'' and make it extremely hard to prosecute (ergo, Koln) mass groping and the like. To prosecute those people you claim to hate so much, they need to change the laws. Again, I know you are too intelligent, too woke and too smart to think about that, but they can't make the laws you desire, the ones enforced by dudes in ghost costumes.
Last edited by sarahtasher; 2018-05-20 at 05:23 PM.
You should have shut up, i would have spared you to look stupid. I perfectly know the law applies for both sex, because if it was not, the law would have been unconstitutionnal and would have been blocked by the Constitutionnal Council.
That doesn't invalidate my point because we botj know Schiappa is an idiot and is full of hatred against men, she proved it many times; she is backed by many hateful organisation posing as feminists, who are responsible for that turn of things.
We are litteraly in a witch hunting right now, and not only in France; the Weinsten as been used a fuel to those laws; and unles you are acting on bad faith, you know that law, which is in fact impossible to apply, will, if they find a way to apply it, only target men.
The letter of the law fails to hide the true intent.
Then what is the word? Maths has nothing to do with whether I can go outside or not without being bothered, how people behave has to do with it and some people can't behave, which means that I can't go outside without being bothered. That does not mean it has to happen every single time for me be to able to say I can't go outside without being bothered.
That's because, Sherlock, there are far less cases of sexual harassement from females to males than the reverse. Especially in the demographics edgelords care so much about. The said edgelords who casually dismiss the rare case of female to male abuse (ex: teacher and students) with ''arguments'' such as ''NOT RAPE, WAS HOT''
Actually, according to the text, you'd have to be caught by an authority on the act, it's not a 'report someone for doing something' stuff, so as long as you don't do it in front of the police, it's 'fine'(which makes this a bit absurd)
I for one agree with the whole initiative, it's easy to just look at the femi-nazi ideals on this but truth is, France is plagued with some people that cannot be named but who come from certain less interesting places of the world, and those people are sometimes little better than animals. But the same defenders of women are the ones who defend them so the country is in a bind.
I think this should also be expanded to littering and other stuff that are slowly turning cities like Marseilles and parts of Paris in the same kind of cesspools those people came from, just add a symbolic fine on it, some verification on their documents and file while we're at it and adequate consequences en suite.
I'm not trying to 'spread hatred' or anything, but things are getting out of control and small actions like this one may help solve that on the long run.
It does, math tells you that out of every 60 times you go out there are 53 instances where you will be able to go out without being bothered. And again, there is no such rule that states that no one should be able to bother you, that is why it is called childish to say something like it.
You just don't know what the word "can" means.
If there's two red candies and 3 green candies, I will most often get a green candy. I can get a red candy. Because there are red candies there.
If you go out today and don't get harassed, that means you can go outside and not get harassed.
Let's try once more, though not sure why I bother with a delusional feminist, who only believes in "feelings", and who thinks that FACTS are "oppresive" and "misogynistic".
To use you earlier example - You go outside 60 times. 7 times you are "bothered". Which, simple math tells us, leaves 53 times where you are NOT bothered, by your own words. Which, literally means that you DID go outside without being bothered, which means that's it's POSSIBLE to do so, which means that you CAN do it.
In other words, you're stupid.