I don't know how many times I have to repeat that there was a Cenarion Camp there. Drop a boulder on someone's house, and try to claim the ground isn't theirs after, tell me how that goes.
And even if you want to think "the Horde had a camp there!" makes it fine, that doesn't make the entire zone Horde territory. Which is what I was talking about anyway,
And you're comparing someone who thought it was a good idea to keep a Dreadlord as a commander to Anduin.
This is why picking apart things doesn't really help you out, since you try to claim "they're enemies though!" but then follow it up admitted that "Yeah it's not unreasonable to say that she could be told she should have known".
Because in the end, Genn came back saying "Yeah she tried to enslave one of Odyn's commanders and I stopped her".
One was a rebellion yes, but the other ended up being justified in the end. If Genn let Sylvanas do as she wished, she would have been helping the enemy (Helya).
Because yet again, Genn doesn't require an actual punishment. His gut feeling was right.
If anything, bringing Genn to Arathi would be a punishment to Genn.
I said "helped", not single-handedly, it would be nice to discuss without having words shoved down my throat ya know.
And no, it had nothing to do with Sylvanas, it was Anduin and Faol. The letter even says this, and everything is planned out.
All Sylvanas did was pick who could go. And if you re-read the excerpts, Anduin was quite upset that Sylvanas ruined something that was going well, and even the letter to her said hopefully it could be a start to mending damages.
And this is why I said bias, because you're not really accepting anything other than "He should be punished!". You have no intention of discussing it or viewing it from another direction. You are set in your opinion against Genn. Hence, bias.
Its not quite free will if you're not allowed to leave.
There was no peace at the start of Legion, since the death of Varian.
Did you miss the whole rogue campaign?