The problem, in that respect, is the Freedom Cockus.
"That's not how it's spelled."
Yes, but it's how they're acting. They are pushing for the $5 billion that the Senate can't pass and causing the split you describe. There are 34 Freedom Cockus members in the House out of 237 Republicans. A bill can pass if it has Democrats on board, or the Freedom Caucus, but it needs one or the other.
If the House attempts the $5 billion Wall funding bill, the Senate won't pass it.
If the House attempts the $1.3 or $1.6 billion non-Wall-funding bill, the Freedom Cockus won't vote for it -- or, at least, that's the noise they're making right now. Problem is, the Democrats probably would, so, the Freedom Cockus isn't relevant.
Until!
Riders are attached that the Democrats oppose. Then the Freedom Cockus is back to being relevant again.
The Freedom Cockus knows 2019 will be an interesting year for them, as they become irrelevant in the House. However, they also have a new weapon: their head, Meadows, is the only name Trump has floated for Chief of Staff who's also publicly asked for the job. As I've discussed before, that means they think they get a special favor, paid in advance, by Trump. And it could be "veto anything without Wall funding".
Trump has said there's no rush, and that he'll pick his Chief of Staff in a week or two. What else happens in a week or two? I think there's a very realistic chance Meadows is holding his acceptance back until Trump's check cashes. The Freedom Cockus are known serial obstructionists, more than the Washington norm, as demonstrated by their proven words and actions. They 100% side with Trump on shutting down the government over 0.1% of the budget spent on an item that won't work and which most of America doesn't even want.
And, a $5 billion vote is on the way. And [url=https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/420950-sen-kennedy-i-think-were-going-to-have-a-shutdown]this is Senator Kennedy R-LA on CNN of all places[/ulr] saying he thinks there's going to be a shutdown. So I'm not making a blind guess, here.
Of note: Kennedy also said “As far as I’m concerned if it’s shut down, it’s a pox on all of our houses. I don’t know politically who’s going to win or lose this.” Which is exactly what someone would say, if they did know who was going to win/lose in this, and they knew whose fault it was. Hint: it was the guy who said it would be his fault on live national TV.
- - - Updated - - -
Trump: "We need this border wall to keep the migrants out! You'd better give me $5 billion for the Wall, or -- "
Migrant: "I have an idea. Give me $50,000 and I'll go away."
Trump: " -- wait, what?"
Migrant: "You don't want me in there, and you seem to have problems with the money. I'll make it easy. Give me $50,000 and I'll go away."
Trump: "You can't be serious."
Migrant: "I am bigly serious. Look, $50,000 is a lot of money to me, but not to you. The average salary in Argentina is $864 or so. $50,000 and I can put up with anything there since I can provide for my family forever."
Trump: "Do you know how much money I'd have to pay to give everyone in the caravan $50,000? That would cost more than the Wall!"
Migrant: "I don't think that's true. Let's say we use the largest estimates of the caravan of 10,000 people. And you give us each $50,000. Well, how much is that?"
Trump: "More than $5 billion, that's for sure!"
Migrant: "Um, no. Actually, it's 10%. Less, really, since I'm pretty sure you won't give $50,000 to a kid and let them loose in South America, and that 10,000 estimate is worst case scenario."
Trump: "What makes you think I'd accept that offer? That's extortion!"
Migrant: "Look, to seek asylum, we have to arrive legally with legal papers. Signing a contract to forfeit asylum, or even flat-out entry, for $50,000 is something that could be very legal and enforceable. And don't pretend you've never used money as a club before, or extorted during a business deal. China says hi, by the way."
Trump: "But it would set a bad President! We'd see more and more migrants seeking asylum every year, asking for more money!"
Migrant: "True. You could also pre-set a limit. And don't pretend that $5 billion would have built the whole Wall anyhow. You were also going to ask for more money next year, weren't you?"
Trump: "Of course!"
Migrant: "So it's the same thing. Or, you could invest the same cost into helping the people in Central and South America, so that the caravans don't need to exist. I mean, Mexico just pledged $30 billion to do exactly that so you could literally buy yourself some goodwill during the NAFTA 1.0.0.2 situation."
Trump: "Well I say what you're doing, demanding money or you'll cause major political unrest, is terrorism! And I won't pay it! Get out!"
Migrant: "Okay, if you say so."
Trump: "Now, give me $5 billion or I shut down the government!"
Pence: "ZZZZZZZZ*glurk* huh?"
Migrant: "I totally forgot he was here."
- - - Updated - - -
So is putting fourteen thousand, seven hundred children in concentration camps.
"How many are they planning on holding?"
Well, they're at 92% capacity, so, one thousand three hundred more, tops.
"Didn't Trump send troops down there who could build --"
Yes.
"Are they build -- "
No.