Riot Games' method is so much better... you can bought buy skins directly or earn in-game through grind for it. Purely RNG that Blizzard have a fetish with can fuck right off.
Riot Games' method is so much better... you can bought buy skins directly or earn in-game through grind for it. Purely RNG that Blizzard have a fetish with can fuck right off.
The point I'm making is I don't see the issue. Lootboxes are the package gold comes in. You can earn lootboxes by playing, if you don't want to spend real money. I'm not seeing that significant a difference between the direct or indirect gold acquisition. It just seems like a silly and irrelevant windmill to tilt at.
And the point someone else made you completely ignored to fit your own argument.
But then again typical of you.
You know damn well they meant being able to buy the skin directly with real money such as "T-Racer for £5" or something. But no you did exactly what you normally do which was twist that to suit your own point.
Last edited by Eleccybubb; 2018-08-27 at 05:49 PM.
Really, that just means I'm pricing it poorly. A glance at HotS skin values shows they sell legendary skins for 1600 gems, and you can buy gems directly, and 1600 gems is around $16 USD. And honestly, I'd see an argument for Overwatch skins to be pricier; it's a more complicated and detailed model.
How is it limited time? I keep the gold from the loot boxes I get from normally playing the game till an event skin or just new skin in general comes out that I want. I'm level 843 and almost always get my 3 free boxes each week, so it's not hard for me to keep gold on hand for new stuff I want.
The argument I keep seeing is "but it's random and gambling!" And my consistent response to that is " . . . so?"
I've yet to get a response that wasn't moral outrage in response to that. Buying lootboxes in Overwatch isn't functionally different from buying packs of trading cards. And I don't see anyone trying to prevent that.
And given that I've consistently been sitting on anywhere between 2k and 5k gold at any given moment since about 3 months after launch, even though I pretty much instantly buy a legendary skin/emotes/poses/etc for new heroes I like (spent nearly 2k on Brigitte at launch, for instance), and I'm really struggling to see where the issue lies.
Last edited by Endus; 2018-08-27 at 05:53 PM.
True, but the worst they can do is make them give a % chance to loot each level of card, Like Blue 100% (already known) Epic 30%, Legendary 10% (it's about that one, one every 10-11 packs). I don't even know if MTG has to print their odds though. I don't find the fact that it's "digital" to really mean anything besides the fact that it's even EASIER to get the cards you want.
They are saying that the skin should be directly purchaseable or the coins should be able to be bought just like gems are in HotS. You go into HotS, buy your gems, and buy a skin. Loot boxes exist but gems allow you to buy the skin directly.
As there should be an option to buy coins directly in Overwatch. Not a chance at coins.
As for gambling. It's the subject of many debate. Belgium state it clearly is which is the topic at hand. Belgium right now deem this method as gambling and have therefore stopped it.
Last edited by Eleccybubb; 2018-08-27 at 05:54 PM.
Oh, I see. So you weren't saying 'I get lots of gold during events' as in like, a special gold bonus or 'you can earn gold all the time during this period' promotion. You were saying 'I get lots of gold I can spend when an event is going on through normally playing the game'.
I can get that you want that.
You haven't made any argument to justify "should", other than you insisting that you want it.
My point is that I don't even care if you consider it "gambling". If you do, it's not different, to me, than buying trading cards or using a claw machine or whatever. This is the "moral outrage" stuff I mentioned above.As for gambling. It's the subject of many debate. Belgium state it clearly is which is the topic at hand. Belgium right now deem this method as gambling and have therefore stopped it.
Again, you say it's gambling. My response is "so what?" It's like when we used to get boxes of cereal that contained 1 of 5 toys. Was it the one we wanted? IT'S A GAMBLE. And nobody had an issue with it.
And why shouldn't players be allowed to buy gold directly to buy their skins?
Why should they play for a chance at gold from boxes or pay? How about you give us a reason why players should not be allowed to purchase their skin directly from the skin page with real money or use their money to buy 1000 coins or w/e to buy a skin. Rather than pull your shitty tier "moral outrage" card to try and get yourself some brownie points.
Defend it all you want. It's a shitty corporate practice which thankfully is slowly being clamped down on.
And I retract my HotS statement. Seems shards from Loot Boxes are now the only way to get skins... woop de fucking doo. Remove the gems option and just offer a crappier alternative.
This. Name me one way the consumer is affected negatively from being able to buy it directly.
Here they are affected negatively by having to play a game of chance with the boxes and hope coins come out or the skin.
It's not fun for the consumer. If you find opening a box of 4 items fun and not getting any gold or the skin you've been farming forever then I have to question what you find fun.
Last edited by Eleccybubb; 2018-08-27 at 06:03 PM.
You're arguing against something I'm not saying. I'm not arguing what you describe is "bad" or "wrong". Just that you've made precisely no argument to argue that it should be required. And fundamentally, that's what you're trying to prove, here. Not that it could be an option, which is trivially true, but that it should be an option, which you've provided nothing to back up.
Why not? You keep not making the argument that you need to make. You keep expecting moral outrage to carry the day.Why should they play for a chance at gold from boxes or pay?
Again, you haven't explained why it's "shitty", other than you don't personally like it. Maybe that just means you shouldn't spend money on things you don't enjoy?Defend it all you want. It's a shitty corporate practice which thankfully is slowly being clamped down on.