Brett Kavanaugh Should be Impeached

[announced]

ROTFLMAO
Do you even read the articles you post?


No he wasn't.



Why bother with Birtherist Questions from the Right Wing that are obsessed with Conspiracy?



She did, but when people found out Ford came out.



How can they even do a "Proper" investigation if they didn't even interview the Main suspects?

Actually they did interview the main suspects. Kavanaugh wasn't interviewed again because there was no need to. He has already testified under oath, under threat of perjury and if he would have nothing new to say if he was interviewed again by the FBI.
TIL Szechuan doesn't know how to read. Is it just wilful ignorance or are you actually illiterate?
It's been linked right here for you in bold letters from this article https://www.cbsnews.com/news/brett-k...viewed-so-far/
Who is the FBI Interviewing?
Mark Judge
On Oct. 2, Judge's lawyer, Biz Van Gelder, said in a statement the FBI had finished interviewing Judge. The FBI's interview took place over the course of at least two days.

[szechuan]

Actually they did interview the main suspects.

Kav and Ford ARE MAIN SUSPECTS.

TIL Szechuan doesn't know how to read. Is it just wilful ignorance or are you actually illiterate?

Says the one who wrote

Do you mean Kavanaugh at Judge.

Kavanaugh "AT" Judge?

Kavanaugh was already interviewed multiple times by the FBI.

Again, No he wasn't. The Article you posted also Contradicts this.

Kavanaugh was already interviewed multiple times by the FBI

COMPLETE BULL ROFL.

Do you even READ the articles you post?

He has already testified under oath, under threat of perjury and if he would have nothing new to say if he was interviewed again by the FBI.

Wrong, Testifying Under Oath is not the same as an Investigation, Stop Lying to yourself.

[announced]

Kav and Ford ARE MAIN SUSPECTS.


Says the one who wrote


Kavanaugh "AT" Judge?


Oooh a typo, you got me there Sherlock.
Again, No he wasn't. The Article you posted also Contradicts this.


Actually he was interviewed multiple times in 6 previous background checks done by the FBI.
COMPLETE BULL ROFL.
NO its not ROFL
Do you even READ the articles you post?


Yes, do you?
Wrong, Testifying Under Oath is not the same as an Investigation, Stop Lying to yourself.

The only one lying to yourself is you. You are stuck in an echo chamber and unable to reach the truth. Keep on digging though, eventually you might hit some gold or oil.
Actually the suspect, or suspects are the ones suspected of committing the crime. Source - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspect
Ford is not a suspect because she was not being investigated of committing any crimes. If this was criminal trial she would be considered the victim. Kavanaugh and Judge would be the suspects. Judge was interviewed recently by the FBI, Kavanaugh was not.

If you want to debate as to why the FBI didn't interview Ford or Kavanaugh again - This might article has some insight into it. https://hotair.com/archives/2018/10/...nterview-ford/

Like I said previously, Kavanaugh had nothing new to say. He had already spoken to the Judiciary committee and given his statements. If the corroborative evidence does end up pointing to him actually attempting to rape her then by all means, throw him in jail and toss away the key. But don't try to hang an innocent man simply because you don't like his politics.

[szechuan]

The only one lying to yourself is you. You are stuck in an echo chamber and unable to reach the truth. Keep on digging though, eventually you might hit some gold or oil.

Says the one who keeps lying to himself.

Actually the suspect, or suspects are the ones suspected of committing the crime.

Did you already forget that this Investigation was suppose to get to the bottom of the Truth? You said you didn't believe Ford and accused her of Lying under oath which is also A crime!

If this was criminal trial she would be considered the victim.

ROTFLMAO! Victims Get investigated too and you act like SHE wasn't even a SUSPECT to all the Dissenters. ROFL

Kavanaugh had nothing new to say.

Then there should not be a problem with having him interviewed again.

Judge was interviewed recently by the FBI, Kavanaugh was not.

Actually he was interviewed multiple times in 6 previous background checks done by the FBI.

Background Checks? ROFL That is not an Interview nor a thorough investigation.

Oooh a typo, you got me there Sherlock

Says the person trying to act Smart.

But don't try to hang an innocent man simply because you don't like his politics.

Innocent? BWAHHAHAHAHAH

The fact you still think he's "INNOCENT" is hilarious.

[PACOX]

I've had to submit background checks by local PD for various jobs. Not one of those checks would even real if I've ever had a parking ticket or not.

[szechuan]

I've had to submit background checks by local PD for various jobs. Not one of those checks would even real if I've ever had a parking ticket or not.

It's also interesting that people don't seem to think Victims also get investigated especially when already Acting suspicious to a lot of people.

[announced]

Says the one who keeps lying to himself.


Did you already forget that this Investigation was suppose to get to the bottom of the Truth? You said you didn't believe Ford and accused her of Lying which is also A crime!

Nice attempt at moving the goal posts, However no one is about to file charges against her due to the high bar set for perjury.

ROTFLMAO! Victims Get investigated too.

They do, but the main focus is on the suspects. If Ford wanted to be interviewed by the FBI she could simply go there herself and request an interview.

Then there should not be a problem with having him interviewed again.

This makes it clear as to why he wasn't interviewed.

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/10/...nterview-ford/

The problem with this argument is that the process got it backward. As a prosecutor, did Townsend ever have a case where law enforcement interrogated a witness after they testified under oath about his or her allegation? After testifying in some detail, thanks to Rachel Mitchell’s under-appreciated thoroughness, what more was the FBI going to get in a voluntary interview? If she added anything, it would contradict her earlier testimony, which in some ways contradicted her earlier statements to Feinstein and Rep. Anita Eshoo. Since Ford testified and repeatedly asserted that she couldn’t recall any other potential witnesses to the incident, any new leads suddenly coming from an interview after 36 years would be highly suspect.

To her credit, Norah O’Donnell mentions that Ford and Kavanaugh had already testified under oath, which Townsend acknowledges, but says the FBI could have gotten more. “You don’t get out of that the therapists notes, which you could have asked her for permission to get,” Townsend says, referring to a response from Ford’s attorneys this week. “You don’t get the polygraph, which you could have asked her for.”

That, however, ignores the fact that the Senate Judiciary has been asking for both for more than two weeks, and Ford has refused to turn them over. Her attorneys made the offer yesterday to exchange them for an FBI interview as an obvious strategy to delay the process further, just as they did when they claimed Ford couldn’t fly to Washington because of trauma-related phobias — a claim demolished during the hearing last week. Those materials should have been produced at the hearing when Ford relied on them for her claims against Kavanaugh, not as a bargaining chip to get a sit-down with FBI agents later. Her refusal to cooperate is not an indication of an inadequate FBI background check but of a flawed and perhaps false allegation. If either of these truly corroborated Ford, would she have withheld them at all? Especially the polygraph recordings?

Finally, Townsend accuses the White House of limiting the FBI’s scope to keep Ford locked out, but deputy press secretary Raj Shah denies it. The scope of the background check was set by the Senate Judiciary Committee, which had already given three hours to Ford for her testimony under oath:


Townsend is a more serious person than the Senate Democrats who are lining up to slam the FBI, and her question deserves a more serious response. But that doesn’t make this question any more relevant.

[szechuan]

This makes it clear as to why he wasn't interviewed.

Nothing but a Piss Poor excuse. If it was a Thorough Investigation the Main Suspects would be Interviewed.

- - - Updated - - -

Nice attempt at moving the goal posts, However no one is about to file charges against her due to the high bar set for perjury.

I didn't move crap. It's not about Filing Charges. It's about getting to the truth.

but the main focus is on the suspects

Are you suggesting that BLASEY FORD is not the main focus in a high profile investigation about finding out the truth?

If Ford wanted to be interviewed by the FBI she could simply go there herself and request an interview.

Doesn't change the fact that this was a limited investigation and Ford thought she was going to get interviewed.

It clearly doesn't seem to matter to you or to Trump. Trump recently said he didn't care if Ford was telling the truth or not and his Tribal Trumplings started cheering. Interesting to see how unreasonable Right Wingers are becoming.