On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
20% of women are raped in their lifetimes. 1 in 5 women you know have been forced to have sex against their wills.
But you conservatives have managed to convince yourselves that it's men who are the victims.
Last edited by Jagscorpion; 2018-10-07 at 11:12 PM.
10% of all rapes are proved to be false allegations. That means 1 in 10 men accused of rape are actually victims themselves.
But you progressives have managed to convince yourselves that women never lie and putting innocent men through a harrowing court process is not a problem. Better one innocent man go to prison than to let 9 rapists go free right?
It's precisely because these kinds of allegations aren't taken seriously that it took her 37 years and the threat of her alleged abuser taking a highly powerful position that could alter the course of the country's development to come forward.
Most rapes aren't reported because the ones that are either aren't properly investigated, aren't properly punished, the ones who come forward risk ruining their lives just as much if not more than the abuser, and even family members tend to defend the abuser. It kills hope in the justice system; why should they trust the justice system when the default opinion is "no way, he's not that kind of person" and trying to prove otherwise tends to only prolong the trauma?
Does anyone actually believe this due process BS? We all get that it only applies to DC elitist Republican apparatchiks, right? Conservatism is a very simple idea:
There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.
KAVANAUGH was an east coast white boy who legacied he way into Yale after going to the elitist of elites Georgetown prep schools. He then served in the Republican legal apparatus for decades. At every point he could he justified more state power, more torture, more war, and less due process. But then in a non-trial setting, he screams for due process. Why? Because he was in the IN-group for who the law protects, but does not bind. But all those brown people upon whom he wrote legal memos justifying government atrocities when he was working for Bush2, they were in the OUT-group for the whom the law binds but does not protect.
Yeah now let’s be real here. Conservatives aren’t even close to being the main base that wants to be a victim. That’s the far left. Conservatives aren’t the ones who made up safe spaces. Or micro aggressions. Or insist on being referred to by a new created gender. They’re not the ones that bland comedians like Jerry Seinfeld are too scared to do comedy around for fear of triggering them. You can give the conservatives a lot of shit, but pretending they’re the ones who strive to be victims doesn’t fly.
Also I don’t think you know what a source is. He isn’t using Kelly as a source. He used a video where she voiced an opinion on something. That isn’t a source.
That is not what the idea of conservatism is. You may believe that, and certainly powerful people with connections tend to get away with more than people without, and you can find examples of this across the political spectrum, but that's human nature. The problem is that many people start with your attitude as their underlying assumption, and then assume that anything that doesn't fit within these parameters is simply more evidence of government coverup, etc... It admits no challenge to it's assertions because any challenge is automatically assumed to be suspect.
Edit:As a side note I'm pretty sure even the most staunch left-wing leaning sources acknowledge that kavanaugh was not a legacy, that he got in on merit.
Edit2: looks like I'm wrong, some have made that claim, though iirc washington post states it's not accurate. I don't particularly agree with a lot of the washington post analysis tbh so who knows. A reasonable argument could be made either way I think, but dont have all the particulars.
Last edited by Jagscorpion; 2018-10-08 at 12:20 AM.
lol.
Due process.....like a sham less than a week investigation where no one was interviewed, and the guys whose life was supposedly ruined is now a sitting supreme court justice?
or is it the due process of unarmed black men being shot to death by police.
I mean, the lack of intelligence it takes to complain about how white men are somehow disadvantaged is so mind numbingly breathtaking it can only come from people who worked at and or listen to Fox News.