Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
  1. #41
    Oh no.. the classic forum containment field was breached! The stupid is spreading! Quick! Someone call the nostalgia busters!

    Lame ass bait thread, even if taken literally, the only viable answer is Blizzard, because neither faction can really win and the only one who will win by opening a backwards server is Blizzard as well. No matter how shit the current version of the game is, if I wanted to go back to the steaming pile of shit that was classic I might as well just play any of the asian shovelware MMOs, since the only difference between classic and them was having a bunch of written quests that gete you at least 80% to max level, some of the asia ones even have enough quests these days to reach max level!

  2. #42

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Dusty tome View Post
    Not how this works Denmark one must rise and one must fall.
    And that there is the issue, people who are so far into their own camp that it absolutely have to be a us vs them scenario.

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Powerogue View Post
    Whatever happens, we can be sure that people will still complain. I'll always bring up Minecraft because it's always relevant: 100% of all patches, sub-patches and snapshots in the entire history of the game are always playable at any time, the most moddable game in the industry, and people still complain when it changes.
    It's not like there are no problems with minecraft updating (sometimes for ludicrious and pointless things), especially when modding the game it always comes with a bunch of issues, rarely does everything go smoothly. So while it's great that you can get any old version, that still does not mean you aren't negatively impacted by it, especially if you factor in mods or friends.

  5. #45
    Moderator Aucald's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Epic Premium
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA-US
    Posts
    45,961
    This is not the forum for the discussion of Classic, and given that this thread was created under seemingly false pretenses and there are plenty of threads like it without the misleading thread title there's not really a need for it. Closing.
    "We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •