It's fine if the wall is mahood thing. Walls are good, manhood is good.
Womanhood is good too, so if they want to build a womanhood building in addition to the wall that is also fair.
It's fine if the wall is mahood thing. Walls are good, manhood is good.
Womanhood is good too, so if they want to build a womanhood building in addition to the wall that is also fair.
I'll need more than the thread about the democrats doing something just as bad?
You saying Republicans say childish shit too isn't slapping down my argument that it makes you look bad to do the same thing as them.
Sure man, there's some sweet karma there. It just makes democrats look really bad.
Several big ass doors in the wall and massive facilities staffed to the gills with all the people required to properly assist asylum seekers within minutes of their arrival instead of months or more? Yes, great idea!
Lol wut - "just as bad" as what? I think you're going to also add some specifics in addition to the volumes of requested evidence.
Good thing that's not what I was doing.
I was pointing out that
a) the Republicans loved that when it worked, and
b) are crying like cowering little children when it was turned against them
The time to say "we should change the rules" is not when you start losing. That is my point. Plus, Megaman is right, you're trying to equivocate both sides, and one side has clearly been far more immature than the other. One dick joke and you're crying "that's immature!" on the forums? Trump brought up his penis in the debates. Your deflection is lame-ass, limp-dick, and IMPOTUS. Ignored.
Our resident republicans are returning to the discussions, now in the form of level-headed centrists!
Got some stats to back that up chief or only fear-infused propaganda?
Also, even if that was true, that's part of the reason you properly assist asylum seekers. Your argument is invalid.
You gotta love how any real problems we have with immigration could be resolved just through proper staffing.
It must be a difficult life living with paranoid schizophrenia and dementia, always thinking people are attacking you, when in reality they're attacking your arguments, and that they're making the arguments you say they're making. Nobody really cares about you, you're not special, you're just another sad washed up nobody using Fox News shit-tier strawmen to derail threads.
Of course you won't see this unless someone like @Breccia whom you haven't ignored would have to quote me. You only flatter yourself saying that you're the wicked witch of MMO-OC OT. You're more like an annoying gnat that used to occasionally make smart posts, and now your masters thesis length posts are basically titled "BUT HER EMAILS: @Theodarzna's take on why liberals will destroy the world and will steal candy from babies".
But I gotta admit, you making thinly veiled death threats to Democrats would have, in the past, netted you a perma ban from these forums. It seems moderation has fallen so low that death threats are now simply considered trolling. Other than you getting away with murder-threats, nobody cares about you or your shallow logic any more.
- - - Updated - - -
"I never supported Trump, show me a post where I DIRECTLY supported Trump!"
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Did you completely forget what you originally said to me? You offered me a quote from Trump making a childish joke just like this thread is. I said that's just as bad.
Why would I care about this?
Why would I care about this?
Well I didn't do that. You're just making up arguments to fight against.
You made up an argument, fought against your own argument, and got this upset. Weird.
I also like the "1 or 2 legit". That's cute. It was over 400 last time. But, to keep it on topic, I can see why Trump, in the ongoing effort to convince people his "manhood thing" was huge, would get 1 and 400 swapped all the time.
Hey, you think he'll use a "no true Scotsman" and try to redefine "legitimate"? Because that's a logical phallis, see?
I didn't forget at all, you just clearly didn't understand my point.
I offered that quote to you because you were (and still are, amazingly) trying to suggest that it's fine for Republicans to make crass jokes, but not fine for Democrats, and that if Democrats do such a thing it suddenly invalidates them, but the same doesn't apply to Republicans.
You want to play in the mud and scream when someone else sticks their toe in it.
Careful, if you challenge arguments like this, the thin veneer washes away and all the person has left is to admit they just don't like immigrants.