Andromeda is not nearly as bad as something like Ride to Hell Retribution. Check out Angry Joe's review of it! It is hilarious!
Back on topic the original Mass Effect introduced us to a galaxy with multiple alien races with each having their own unique history and geopolitical situation as well as two ancient races, the Protheans and the Reapers. Compare that to Andromeda where we only get two alien races including an ancient race that disappeared and some death robots. Mass Effect Andromeda also lacks memorable moral choices and has only one ending compared to the multiple endings of the first Mass Effect. I fondly remembered the moral choices in the first Mass Effect while I find the moral choices of Andromeda forgettable. Also in ME1 at least two party members can die based on your decisions. With Andromeda they played it safe.
The Nexus also lacks the beautiful music of the Citadel.
I thought all of the crew except Liam and Peebee were okay. I would prefer mature scientists and security officers instead of naive college students.
I want a true successor to Mass Effect 1. Who here agrees?
Why did they play it safe? Was it the backlash to ME3's ending?