Doesn't really matter. Considering what blizzard thinks of the warchief position, whoever they pick will be:
A: A "good guy" warchief (Baine, Thrall, Lor'themar) that will get killed pointlessly by a trash mob on the next expansion to replace him with a "bad guy" warchief.
or
B: They'll skip all pretensions, and just go right ahead for the Bad Guy Warchief from the get-go (Gallywix, Gera'yah, literally ANY FORSAKEN) to set up the next Garrosh 3.0: Electric Boogaloo the third, The Punchening.
Either way, I'm not getting fooled again. I'm refusing to be attached to whatever idiot they pick for the position until they've lived for at least the next six expansions. Until that happens, in my eyes, whoever is the warchief of the horde, has about as many odds to live as a red shirt does in Star Trek.
Por que odiar si amar es mas dulce? (*^_^*)
I don't know, for me this never went past the headcanon stage because it never received any actual support in word or action.
If Sylvanas would stop being an asshole for the sake of being one, yeah.
It's not like she has some sort of history of getting bitten in the ass by the same people she tried to enslave.
Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
"the ends justify the means", "blah blah isnt evil! War has no rules!" may apply to people affected by the war, but not the one who is responsible for it in the first place.
This war is unnecessary and stupid, not fueled by anyone except Sylvanas' own paranoia and stupidity, if it's gonna be up to thrall he is NOT gonna let Sylvanas keep the warchief title if he has any sanity left in him.
Last edited by Raetary; 2019-04-20 at 12:04 PM.
Formerly known as Arafal
What if we had no warchief but instead a council
Nope, but then neither have the vast majority of the Horde, something the story now acknowledges. Any hints of an interest in the Horde's well-being separate from Sylvanas is at least an implication. But you are right that a lot of this is wishful thinking and conjecture on my part. I'll freely admit I'm looking for any hook that they're not going to be inflicting Calia on us.
Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
either thrall is coming back or lor themar, both baine and saurfang suck, baine is spineless, surfang is too old and blinded by honor to much (before people start calling me a sylvannas fanboi, i am not, i hate her aswell)
Last edited by valky94; 2019-04-20 at 12:12 PM.
I'm still skeptical about all this.
Thrall being back now doesn't guarantee him becoming leader again, just like how we thought he'd take leadership back from garrosh. Him no longer being a shaman should be a big deal and a story about how this has effected him, but we're not seeing any of that, no book, no quest chain, or even short story, he's just here, almost just in a symbolic meaning if nothing else.
Baine being warchief just doesn't sit as well for him because he's got a good heart, wants the right things, but just doesn't strike me as the kind of character to make harder decisions, something even thrall had to do when leading the horde.
Saurfang has all the right stuff, the sense of honor, experience in war and tactics, the diplomacy, all stuff that a good leader needs. But his age and fact that he carries his need to die in honorable combat is always there, suggesting his leadership wouldn't be long lived.
Lor'themars showing he cares about the horde surviving, not just for his people anymore. He's got all the traits saurfang has, but he just still feels undeveloped enough for it to be a serious thing him becoming warchief. Maybe if they built him up for a couple of years in why he could be, I could see it happen.
Really, at this stage this things up in the air and with so many issues I don't see any forgone conclusion yet.
#boycottchina
Your internal bias and idiotic opinions are showing through.
- - - Updated - - -
That's right! We should have stuck with Garrosh.
- - - Updated - - -
Thrall was the given choice three expansions ago (even more so now that Metzen all but hinted at it during last year's BlizzCon).
Watch this and tell me that Blizz is not eagerly salivating at the mouth for Thrall to be warchief again. Just read any 5 of the comments on the video. Make sure you have your barf bag ready though.
Councils are easier to bribe and corrupt. They usually do not care as much about their subjects as single leader. They treat their country as shared property which isn't really theirs so they can easily betray it to get their own wealth from third party. Monarchs at the other hand take care of their property, because it's theirs.
No, Genn would not like a word.
Sylvanas never used his miserable ambush as a reason for the war and it'd be idiotic if she did.
Sylvanas started the war because she is a paranoid maniac, her reasoning is idiotic especially with anduin actively trying to bring peace at the time.
No matter how much you are trying to twist it, Sylvanas is the one responsible for this mess and none of her actions are justified in any way shape or form.
Last edited by Raetary; 2019-04-20 at 01:17 PM.
Formerly known as Arafal
Basic Campfire for honor, for the Horde!
If you knew the candle was fire then the meal was cooked a long time ago.