Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ...
3
4
5
  1. #81
    "when they were busted stealing $1,200 worth of merchandise from an Apple store" - so it was like, one pair of earphones?

  2. #82
    The facial recognition software worked perfectly. Using the data it was given it correctly matched the face of the thief to the ID they had on file. That isn't the problem here.

    The problem here is that they fed the wrong data into the software. They didn't have a picture of the man who's TD was stolen on file...so they used their surveillance photos of the man that stole from them and associated those with the account of the innocent man.

    This goes back to the oldest days of computer programming....Garbage in, Garbage out.
    Last edited by Evil Midnight Bomber; 2019-04-23 at 06:44 PM.
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  3. #83
    Titan vindicatorx's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Where ever I want, working remote is awesome.
    Posts
    11,210
    Quote Originally Posted by Faroth View Post
    Apple is not the victim of false arrest and whatever impact that causes.
    Technically it wasn't a false arrest. He was arrested because he had a warrant issued for his arrest.

  4. #84
    Quote Originally Posted by vindicatorx View Post
    Technically it wasn't a false arrest. He was arrested because he had a warrant issued for his arrest.
    You win the Hermes of Futurama award for that one.
    "You are technically correct. The best kind of correct."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •