Buzzfeed & SJWs help to ban GEN Zer Soph

[Endus]

Sure? If they do something illegal in their country, go get'em with the law.

Social media as a moral body, deciding what is palatable and what is not? No, thanks.

Literally not what's happening.

All these social media companies are doing is deciding what content they, individually, want published through their services.

That's it. Nor "moral body", no deciding anything for society as a whole, none of that. That's a conspiracy theory you've made up.

Again, Free Speech was always a talking point on the left. Shame on those on the new left that is abandoning it as a principle.

We're not. You just, apparently, have no fucking clue what "free speech" actually means.

It doesn't mean you can seize control of other people's property, for instance. Despite you arguing, here, that it does.

[Endus]

Do you have anything new? You know we don't agree.

Not talking only to you. This is a public forum. Exposing the errors in your reasoning to the audience is more important to me than you agreeing that you're wrong.

In fact, I came do completely don't give a damn on your opinions after you said Sarah Jeong did nothing wrong.

Literally never said that. Ever. Kudos on making shit up.

You're one of the most dishonest posters on this website. You're just here to defend a tribe. Whatevs.

What "tribe"? I'm an outsider pretty much everywhere. I'm not American, so I don't have any "tribe" in their politics. I'm a liberal market socialist, and there's like 14 of us out there in the world, such a "tribe".

[Noxx79]

But you don't expose anything, other than your biased behavior and bitterness. I even quoted your Sarah Jeong defense. You play for a specific team. We know what that team is. You're just a completely dishonest person, willing to ally with the most corrupt entities if it fits your ideological purpose.

Stop wasting my time.

According to you, You’re not allowed to say any of that. Stop trying to censor endus, and stop being so tribalistic.

[prwraith]

Having watched some of her videos, that she's reading from a script presented to her is blindingly obvious. The parents should honestly be shamed for politicizing their kid.

- - - Updated - - -

Do you have anything new? You know we don't agree. In fact, I came do completely don't give a damn about your opinions after you said Sarah Jeong did nothing wrong.

You're one of the most dishonest posters on this website. You're just here to defend a tribe. Whatevs.

Google, Facebook and the like have become too big for their own good.

The state is starting to smell the opportunity. Can't wait for the sharks to get at each other's throats.

It's weird when everything you post is wrong.

[Endus]

But you don't expose anything, other than your biased behavior and bitterness. I even quoted your Sarah Jeong defense.

No. You did not. I even went back to double-check that you didn't edit it in. I never said that, and you know it. You're just lying about it, for some reason.

You play for a specific team. We know what that team is.

I literally asked you what "team" you think I'm on, and you hand-waved with this garbage.

Put up or shut up, bucko.

[prwraith]

Not an argument, as the illiterate "philosopher" would say. Next...

You can say many things about Endus, illiterate certainly isn't one of them.

[Endus]

You can say many things about Endus, illiterate certainly isn't one of them.

Every day, my chosen comic grab for my sig becomes more and more relevant to how this forum treats me.

[prwraith]

Every day, my chosen comic grab for my sig becomes more and more relevant to how this forum treats me.

I've never been able to figure out why though. This forum is hostile to logic.

[ParanoiD84]

lol good stuff, and youtube probably gets a few k deathtreaths a day so who care just ban her or drop it.

[Tazr]

Then jail her. But, it's still a kid that people are terrified of.

Guns are the great equalizers. Look how many NRA idiots get shot by their own toddlers, because they left a loaded, unlocked weapon within easy reach. What harm can a toddler do? A hell of a lot with a gun, it turns out.

How many school shootings involve teens (you know, "just kids")? Oh yeah, just about ALL of them. It's not her age that makes her dangerous (or not), it's her brainwashed, malicious, racist, black little soul.

[ChampionChains]

Clicked the first video I saw on her page and within about 2 minutes of the video she'd already called a chimpanzee by a black mans name. No thanks, just a race/politics/religion/outrage click bait channel. Videos like these are a dime a dozen because they know dumb asses will click and subscribe as long as they drag blacks/muslims/women/obama/anyone-not-white-male-and-christian while they sit back and watch the ad revenue stream in.

[Soxoffender]

If you think that "businesses deciding their own business practices" (i.e. no regulations) is "sound governance", you're not left, it's as easy as that. You don't fool anyone, and yes, a business deciding what it can do or not is self-regulation, i.e. fucking ancap utopia of no regulation. You don't want to regulate corporations, you're no leftie.

State socialism is not the only form of left politics.

[Endus]

Right, right.

Here's your team, socjus left+idpol. Here's what has been requested. Context: Jeong did nothing wrong that should see her Twitter account banned. It's just a prank, brah. Meanwhile, others that "joked" about PoCs and women definitely did a lot wrong.

"Jeong did nothing that would warrant cancelling her account" is not "Jeong did nothing wrong", and you claimed I said the latter.

So, you've just demonstrated that you deliberately lied, to misrepresent my position.

I'll also note that the conversation you're linking to was to Jeong creating a Patreon in 2017, and everything you linked is from 2015 or earlier, and the thread we were in was debating about whether current activity off-site was grounds for action against a user. So you're pulling my comments out of context, to boot. Nothing Jeong was doing in 2017 would have warranted cancelling her new Patreon account. Context. It kinda matters.

As for the "team", you're just citing right-wing buzzwords.

"Social justice" boils down to "I think people should be treated fairly and without prejudice". Explain to me how that's remotely objectionable?

If you mean identity politics in this sense; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_politics
Then I do not and have never supported that outlook. The issue is the exclusivity, which I have never supported.

So, again, just empty bullshit from you.

[Elba]

Sarah Jeong is cool. Only snowflakes get offended by her.

That kid from the OP is a Nazi.

- - - Updated - - -

Jeong trashes whites for years, mocks entire race, entire gender, you SAID, YOUR WORDS, that she did nothing to warrant a ban of her account and immediately play defense and dismiss the concerns.

Nothing she said is offensive.

[Endus]

Can you stop already?

Mountains of outrage from you when some right winger does something shitty and racist on Twitter. "ban ban ban", "corporate rights", remove fascists etc. = full support from you.

MOUNTAINS of support.

Jeong trashes whites for years, mocks entire race, entire gender, you SAID, YOUR WORDS, that she did nothing to warrant a ban of her account and immediately play defense and dismiss the concerns.

You don't get to weasel out of this. You simply made a mistake and betrayed what you stand for. You should be able to stand for that.

I'm not "weaseling" out of anything.

You lied about what I had said on the issue. You're lying, here.

I never claimed she did nothing wrong. I said it was in the past, she admitted fault, apologized, and has moved on. You keep ignoring context, as if taking my comments out of that context means you can pretend I said something I did not.

And that's not gonna fly. It's a lie. Nothing more.

But now WE KNOW what you stand for as well, and we can treat you accordingly. The curtain has dropped. And the more posts you make on it, the easier it is for readers of the topic to see it, so fine by me.

In short, my job here is done.

I've really made no attempts to conceal or hide what I stand for. I'm pretty open about it.

People like yourself just tend to lie about what I stand for, because what I actually stand for isn't objectionable enough for you to get your rage on.

[Dextroden]

I'm not "weaseling" out of anything.

You lied about what I had said on the issue. You're lying, here.

I never claimed she did nothing wrong. I said it was in the past, she admitted fault, apologized, and has moved on. You keep ignoring context, as if taking my comments out of that context means you can pretend I said something I did not.

And that's not gonna fly. It's a lie. Nothing more.



I've really made no attempts to conceal or hide what I stand for. I'm pretty open about it.

People like yourself just tend to lie about what I stand for, because what I actually stand for isn't objectionable enough for you to get your rage on.

See, that's hilarious because you like to say people don't call someone racist unless they are. Which makes you whatever you keep being called. I wouldn't think you're a communist, but there has to be a reason you keep being called one.

It's really hilarious when you have to abandon talking points.

[Orbitus]

See, that's hilarious because you like to say people don't call someone racist unless they are. Which makes you whatever you keep being called. I wouldn't think you're a communist, but there has to be a reason you keep being called one.

It's really hilarious when you have to abandon talking points.

Only gullible people that think anyone left of Trump is a communist. When in reality, they might be left of center like Endus is.

[Martymark]

The great thing about youtube is that everyone can share their opinions!

(unless their opinions are wrongthink, like this little girl)

[Dextroden]

Only gullible people that think anyone left of Trump is a communist. When in reality, they might be left of center like Endus is.

I've never heard of people near the center who legitimately believe racism=power+privilege

[Theodarzna]

Soph said it best, the media will celebrate a child like "Desmond is Amazing" and will present them as making their own decisions, but vilify a youth with opinions that rats like Joe Bernstein don't like. The Right really needs to be much more vicious with these so-called journalists.