If anything it should be done as a percentage instead of a flat year.
For example maybe someone within 20% younger or older would be fine. (Although it would be adjusted to whatever the legal age of consent is at the lower end)
I'm currently 34 and my dating range as far as who I look for is 18-24. I've dated a 30 year old or two but there's really no point if I can get younger women. When I lived in a lower age of consent state, 16 could work but that was largely frowned upon by society and also creates strange gray areas in the law that you really are best to avoid.
If it's legal, it's not a huge deal. I mean, it's a bit of an odd look for a 50 year old to be dating someone in their 20s but I'm not personally going to judge it as long as both people are happy.
I think way too many people focus on what's socially okay over what makes them happy.
I think there is no age bar set for love this is my personal op pinon you can date anyone through your Aol email account and one more thing if you have any issue in you AOL Mails while chatting then you can visit here for solution.
Younger might look better, but darn it would be weird to date someone that is so inexperienced. Like they are on a different stage in life than you. This did not stop Hugh Hefner though from dating women in their late teens and early 20s. For erotic material, certainly the more youthful the better, but this does not mean these people would make good life partners.
Am I the only one that was not at all surprised that the Phillipines and Japan have incredibly young age of consent?
I was married to two of my female cousins (at different times of course, not together). Both ended and no kids involved... BUT my grandparents are first-cousins... My parents are not though. My brother is married to my ex-wife's sister and they have two kids (very adorable kids and not mentally retarded, thank god).