The trend of refusing to debate.

[Monster Hunter]

This isn't an argument.



You're the one whining about it, so just stop responding. I've told you multiple times you can easily just tap out, but you insist on keeping it going.

im not arguing or debating, think thats 8 times now.

why this is entertaining, you really cant let things go. you had from the first reply when i said im not going to debate it to let it go but you just cant can you? it eats you up too much. you have your ideological view and you just cant stand heresy, bet it burns you that ancap gets listed all over as an anarchist philosophy, but thats the thing as long as it is you cant win anything.

[downnola]

im not arguing or debating, think thats 8 times now.

why this is entertaining, you really cant let things go. you had from the first reply when i said im not going to debate it to let it go but you just cant can you? it eats you up too much. you have your ideological view and you just cant stand heresy, bet it burns you that ancap gets listed all over as an anarchist philosophy, but thats the thing as long as it is you cant win anything.

You keep saying that, over and over, but you keep responding and arguing. You're continuing to make arguments and claims. I don't know who you're trying to fool, but you should seriously reconsider your approach. Seriously, who are you trying to convince, me or you?

Here's an example:

People who are actual anarchists don't have the intellectual merit to have there opinions taken seriously.

This is you trying to make an argument. It's an extremely horrendous one (why should anyone take ancaps seriously, if anarchists don't have the merit to have their opinions taken seriously?), but that's still you trying to argue.

Like I said, you can easily stop arguing and cease posting. I'm not holding a gun to your head and forcing you to post. But if you're going to continue all I can really say is: stop crying and git gud.

[Monster Hunter]

You keep saying that, over and over, but you keep responding and arguing. You're continuing to make arguments and claims. I don't know who you're trying to fool, but you should seriously reconsider your approach. Seriously, who are you trying to convince, me or you?

Here's an example:



This is you trying to make an argument. It's an extremely horrendous one (why should anyone take ancaps seriously, if anarchists don't have the merit to have their opinions taken seriously?), but that's still you trying to argue.

Like I said, you can easily stop arguing and cease posting. I'm not holding a gun to your head and forcing you to post. But if you're going to continue all I can really say is: stop crying and git gud.

response isn't and indication of caring, you should have learnt that by high school, its also not an argument its me stating something, its you who fell thats an invitation to debate. thats your mental problem not mine.

your one of those who thinks the last word wins, i enjoy denying people like you that, grew up with a kid who had a nasty mix of Asperger and adhd, it was great fun tormenting him by denying him the last word,

endus won any way about 5 pages ago so fuck knows what your talking about any more.

[Santti]

Jesus, get a room you two.

[Monster Hunter]

Jesus, get a room you two.

He really really wants to debate. He won't quit till he gets some confirmation that his opinion is correct. And I won't quit because its proving my point about debates about ideology.

[downnola]

response isn't and indication of caring, you should have learnt that by high school, its also not an argument its me stating something, its you who fell thats an invitation to debate. thats your mental problem not mine.

Yes, stating your opinion. And in reality, you making an argument. Clearly, logic and philosophy is not your strong suit.

your one of those who thinks the last word wins, i enjoy denying people like you that, grew up with a kid who had a nasty mix of Asperger and adhd, it was great fun tormenting him by denying him the last word

I mean, that's all I've been doing to you for the past three pages. I'm not the one crying about not caring and wanting to drop it. I'm enjoying myself, bud. You should really stop projecting.

endus won any way about 5 pages ago so fuck knows what your talking about any more.

Endus wasn't agreeing with you. He even responded again to clarify that. You should go back and read again.

I want to be clear that while I pointed out that some forms on anarchism could be hierarchical in concept, I never argued that those forms were proposed by anyone as a serious academic political theory. Much the same way that pure communist utopias are only considered in academia for their symbolism and practical impossibility; no serious academic thinks such a system is actually functional.

- - - Updated - - -

He really really wants to debate. He won't quit till he gets some confirmation that his opinion is correct. And I won't quit because its proving my point about debates about ideology.

I'm not an anarchist. I just don't like ancaps.

[Monster Hunter]

Yes, stating your opinion. And in reality, you making an argument. Clearly, logic and philosophy is not your strong suit.



I mean, that's all I've been doing to you for the past three pages. I'm not the one crying about not caring and wanting to drop it. I'm enjoying myself, bud. You should really stop projecting.



Endus wasn't agreeing with you. He even responded again to clarify that. You should go back and read again.



- - - Updated - - -



I'm not an anarchist. I just don't like ancaps.

No one's an ancap. Also there's more than one right wing anarchist philosophy any way. Still got them waiting to point out to you but it more funny seeing you get so irate over ancaps haha.

Seems more like you who's projecting considering I told you I'm not interested at the first post.

Also he did agree with me. He pointed out your argument why there not was rubbish. His second half just says ancap isn't a serious political theory, which no anarchism is any way, still makes ancap the right wing of of a stupid political theory.

You whole argument you keep trying to make even though I've said I'm not interested is based on you and few people disagreeing with how ancap is categorised, those people listed in the same source as those who agree with how it's categorised. It's not a winnable argument as your own sources are listed with there contradictions same as mine.

But still you persist for 5 pages to have a debate that is meaningless, ancap is categorised how it is, you can't change that, this whole thing as I've said many times is pointless, but you can't let it drop.

you have a problem with rejection. You have problem with people not being interested in what you have to say. You need to deal with that.

[Galactis]

https://images.app.goo.gl/bgYwZnUwynrG4njZ6

Because, I can't figure out how to post just a picture. It doesn't work for me it's blank.

[Monster Hunter]

https://images.app.goo.gl/bgYwZnUwynrG4njZ6

Because, I can't figure out how to post just a picture. It doesn't work for me it's blank.

Right click open image in new tab, paste the path that has the. . Jpg or.. Png file ending.

[Galactis]

Right click open image in new tab, paste the path that has the. . Jpg or.. Png file ending.

Thank you! What do you mean by the file ending, in the URL>?

[Monster Hunter]

Thank you! What do you mean by the file ending, in the URL>?

yea so it only works if the url ends in a legit image file type so like .jpg or .png

when you google an image if you right click the image in google preview thing you get a drop down that should have a "view image" option

click that and it opens a new tab directly at the image source, copy that url into the input box for images and it should show.

edit: sorry its "view image" not "open image in new tab"

[downnola]

No one's an ancap. Also there's more than one right wing anarchist philosophy any way. Still got them waiting to point out to you but it more funny seeing you get so irate over ancaps haha.

I'm sure they're even less relevant and less anarchist than anarcho-capitalism.

You whole argument you keep trying to make even though I've said I'm not interested is based on you and few people disagreeing with how ancap is categorised, those people listed in the same source as those who agree with how it's categorised. It's not a winnable argument as your own sources are listed with there contradictions same as mine.

No, that was the first point I made. It was an observation based on what I know of anarchist thought. I'm not that invested in the topic to be honest, which is why you didn't see me go on for pages with anyone else in this thread about it. Endus responded to my post, I clarified my position, and that's as far as it went. You want to know the difference between that exchange and this one? My short conversation with Endus was cordial, your response to me was not. Endus knows his shit about political philosophy, you do not. Endus can disagree and have conversations with people without coming of as a socially inept teenager, you simply cannot.

That's the crux of this exchange, nothing more.

[Monster Hunter]

I'm sure they're even less relevant and less anarchist than anarcho-capitalism.




No, that was the first point I made. It was an observation based on what I know of anarchist thought. I'm not that invested in the topic to be honest, which is why you didn't see me go on for pages with anyone else in this thread about it. Endus responded to my post, I clarified my position, and that's as far as it went. You want to know the difference between that exchange and this one? My short conversation with Endus was cordial, your response to me was not. Endus knows his shit about political philosophy, you do not. Endus can disagree and have conversations with people without coming of as a socially inept teenager, you simply cannot.

That's the crux of this exchange, nothing more.

The crux is you went for pages because Endus engaged you and i told you to get lost instead, and that didn't sit well with you. Because your not a person strong enough to realise when some one isn't interested in what you have to say.

That's a personal flaw you have, no matter the subject you would act the same way if told to "get lost im not interested"

Your sig is pritty spot on.

[downnola]

The crux is you went for pages because Endus engaged you and told you to get lost, and that didn't sit well with you. Because your not a person strong enough to realise when some one isn't interested in what you have to say.

That's a personal flaw you have, no matter the subject you would act the same way if told to "get lost im not interested"

I have to say, you might be the first person on this board I've seen that legitimately has a problem with needing to get the last word in. None of what you've just typed is true. You're at the point where you're out of things to say so you're just constructing your own version of events.

It's not like I'm the only one in this thread you've been arguing with. Every single one of those exchanges went on until they couldn't be bothered with your nonsense. There isn't a single response to you in this thread that you didn't follow up on. I've seen people sit in denial and delusion before, but you take the cake, my guy.

Your sig is pritty spot on.

You don't understand the point of that sentence, but now that you point it out you are a pretty literal-minded dunce incapable of recognizing irony. So yeah, it is spot on, thanks.

[Monster Hunter]

I have to say, you might be the first person on this board I've seen that legitimately has a problem with needing to get the last word in. None of what you've just typed is true. You're at the point where you're out of things to say so you're just constructing your own version of events.

It's not like I'm the only one in this thread you've been arguing with. Every single one of those exchanges went on until they couldn't be bothered with your nonsense. There isn't a single response to you in this thread that you didn't follow up on. I've seen people sit in denial and delusion before, but you take the cake, my guy.



I doubt you even understand the point of that sentence, but now that you point it out you are a pretty literal minded dunce incapable of recognizing irony. So yeah, it is spot on, thanks.

your projecting again.

you don't really get that card when i told you to go away on the first reply.

[downnola]

your projecting again.

you don't really get that card when i told you to go away on the first reply.

Don't worry son, the second you start boring me you'll have the last post. We're already starting to get close to that point, I can tell you're running out of fuel.

[Monster Hunter]

Don't worry son, the second you start boring me you'll have the last post. We're already starting to get close to that point, I can tell you're running out of fuel.

again you still don't get that argument when you started it.

up side at least its been on topic, people like you show why its better just to deny them the debate.

i like how your building your self an out though, is that how you rationalize it to your condition?

[downnola]

again you still don't get that argument when you started it.

up side at least its been on topic, people like you show why its better just to deny them the debate.

i like how your building your self an out though, is that how you rationalize it to your condition?

I thought we weren't debating? Why would I need an out for a debate we weren't having? I can stay if you don't want me to go. Tell me more about about the anarcho-racial segregation philosophy you've been holding in your back pocket. I'm sure it's a hoot.

[Monster Hunter]

I thought we weren't debating? Why would I need an out for a debate we weren't having? I can stay if you don't want me to go. Tell me more about about the anarcho-racial segregation philosophy you've been holding in your back pocket. I'm sure it's a hoot.

we aren't, thats the the point. this is just you still not excepting that we never will, no matter what i will always deny you the option to debate your opinion, i will reject it dismissively off hand, refuse to engage it or treat it with any respect or legitimacy.

im glad i went with anarcho-capitalism because it got me a subject like you to show my point about people who debate seriously on the net. i was tempted by post-left anarchy as it was more relevant to today but im glad i didn't

[downnola]

we aren't, thats the the point. this is just you still not excepting that we never will, no matter what i will always deny you the option to debate your opinion.

I'm sure that sounded bad ass as you were typing it, but I doubt anyone reading this thread thinks you've denied me anything. You've done a good job of playing along for pages, despite your logically warped, delusional posting claiming otherwise.