On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
Honestly haven't got any political ads from youtube when I watch, but I can't help but notice the hypocrisy on their part with them actually airing paid political ads while at the same time demonetizing other political videos. Not talking about conspiracy theory ones, I mean legit political channels.
Since we can't call out Trolls and Bad Faith posters and the Ignore function doesn't actually ignore it. Add
"mmo-champion.com##li.postbitignored"
to your ublock or adblock filter to actually ignore ignored posters. Now just need a way to ignore responses to them as well.
It's about the Saudis involvement in 9/11 which is a fact.
This is what it's about.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8279236.html
The victims of 9/11 got the green light to bring legal action against the Saudis but the goverment is withholding information needed to proceed.
I think it's simply more plausible that she realized responding to stupid accusations (ie. Dumbass Dump's "Pochahontas" because she once commented she has native American blood-relation that he questions) results in not a constructive counter-argument, but instead a shitmore amount of stupid accusations (ie. Proving she's part Cherokee, but instead of people accepting it - everybody else says that's "proof" she's overusing her blood-line heritage as a tool - despite discussing it only once ever).
In short: She's no longer taking the bait anymore, because the bait always leads to trolls and nothing constructive.
- - - Updated - - -
1) You still get ads on Youtube?
2) Seriously, you aren't using Adblock on Youtube!?! o_O
EDIT: Double post for some reason. =/
Last edited by mvaliz; 2019-11-09 at 09:45 PM.
You can exempt a decent portion in my case almost 41k USD worth. In others as large as 107k depending on a variety of factors. I also manage my own taxes which helps save a decent chunk. I work for ANZ which ends the banking problem and i have used them for the past 5 years or so, i was in New Zealand for a stint also. Like i said i work in finance which perhaps gives me a bit of a leg up when it comes to the average person in dealing with these sort of issues but doing ones taxes and allotments should be second nature at this point. The fee's associated with the international tax prep / filing are a decent chunk of money around 3-4k.
Billionaires give their money to charities rather than directly to poor people because charities are part of the moral money laundering scheme that helps billionaires maintain good PR and keeps the recipients of that “charity” dependent on table scraps. That wealth IS the poor’s.
https://twitter.com/tommyxtopher/sta...28325664792576
So much for Warren giving a fuck about the working class.
Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866
Dontrike/Shadow Priest/Black Cell Faction Friend Code - 5172-0967-3866
If Bloomberg were actually serious about beating Trump he spend 2% it his wealth over the next year to wipe out Trumps fundraising and messaging advantage and help any of the existing Democrats.
But he won’t because his latest stunt is all about a billionaires ego.
That's such a stupid question. One, naming a cabinet now is just stupid. Even if you have people in mind it's a bad look when you work with and/or run run against them.
The question is a loaded trap, as if her worth as a candidate is to pull 3 black names out a hate to say she has 3 token black people in her administration...and why 3?
That was some bullshit.
I don't want to just dismiss Angela Rye because she has said a lot of stuff I agree with but it seems like she is becoming an industry hack. She'll have her own show on CNN or something one day.
Last edited by PACOX; 2019-11-10 at 05:41 PM.
Resident Cosplay Progressive
Just as a for-instance, I imagine Kamala Harris is a top pick for AG, if she doesn't get the nom.
But as a candidate, you can't say that about a fellow candidate, because it's seen as dismissing their candidacy unfairly. You've gotta either wait until they step down or lose, or come to a mutual agreement that you're each other's cabinet picks, and state that publicly.
Which is why she dodged the question by saying some of them are running for President.
It's right up there with "when did you stop beating your husband?"The question is a loaded trap, as if her worth as a candidate is to pull 3 black names out a hate to say she has 3 token black people in her administration...and why 3?
That was some bullshit.
If she names a fellow candidate, she's dismissing their candidacy and talking down to them, which will put Warren in a bad light.
If she names some handful of members of Congress, then anyone she didn't name has cause to feel snubbed.
If she tries to name every black member of Congress, that's way more than 3 names, and if she misses even one person, that's all anyone would take away from it.
There is no good answer to be had. Every single answer will anger her colleagues or will be used maliciously by the press to inflame sentiments against Warren. The journalist shouldn't have even asked.
Now, if Warren had proposed a set of cabinet picks for her Presidency, and none of them were people of color, then you'd have something to work with. This is just bad gotcha bullshit.
I'd agree that ego is a large part of it, but given his announced strategy (skip the first four, then go all in on Super Tuesday), I suspect his candidacy is also about making certain there's an alternative to Sanders and Warren should Biden collapse (Bloomberg's very presence also lets Biden, Buttigeig and others seem moderate by comparison); the wealth inequality and populist impulses that (very mistakenly) led to Trump are also present on the American left (where the mere invocation of "socialism!" is an insufficient deterrent to anti-plutocratic sentiment), and most hectomillionaires (or Very High Net Worth Individuals) would really rather not have American voters thinking about whether or not highly concentrated wealth truly benefits the public or nation (much less that it's within their power to actually do something about it).
"In today’s America, conservatives who actually want to conserve are as rare as liberals who actually want to liberate. The once-significant language of an earlier era has had the meaning sucked right out of it, the better to serve as camouflage for a kleptocratic feeding frenzy in which both establishment parties participate with equal abandon" (Taking a break from the criminal, incompetent liars at the NSA, to bring you the above political observation, from The Archdruid Report.)
Every single candidate is either incompetent or a complete nutjob. Just pick the loser you think has the best chance of beating Trump, because none of them are good candidates by any objective measure.