Is it called Bloodlust or Heroism?

[parasight]

"Haste CD, plz"

We all come from the same pool of warcraft nerds.

[Vargulf the Happy Husky]

W A R
D R U M S

i've got 3 drummer friends that are about to be inspired AF

OT i've always said "pop hero"

[Sevarin]

wow you let everyone on the internet know you hate something mainstream. You so edgy and cool. Am amazed !!!

i hate it because it tastes like shit. get the fuck over yourself.

[Amaterasu65]

Pretty sure even the alliance calls it lust most of the time.

No, we call it hero.

[FuxieDK]

Choose wisely...

Bloodlust, regardless of wether it's Horde, Alliance, Shaman, Hunter, Mage or drums.

Bloodlust and nothing else......except maybe just Lust.

Also, the addon is called WhoLusted, not WhoHeroed --> https://www.curseforge.com/wow/addons/wholusted

[Fistfighter]

I call it Bloodlust on Aliance and Heroism on Horde, to show off that I am an experienced player who plays on both sides, and also to piss off or confuse my raid member.

I call it Timewarp or Hysteria in raids with people from both factions, so I always look like the biggest smug asshole in the party.

[Greengrim]

It's bloodlust, as Alliance shinyboiz didn't even have shaman class back in the day.

[FuxieDK]

I call it Timewarp or Hysteria in raids with people from both factions, so I always look like the biggest smug asshole in the party.

Which game are you playing?

[Temp name]

It's bloodlust, as Alliance shinyboiz didn't even have shaman class back in the day.

Only Horde had Shamans and they were the only class with it so it's Bloodlust.

For the 80th time in this thread.. Lust was introduced in TBC when both factions had shamans. Trying to look cool doesn't work when you don't know what you're talking about

[Fistfighter]

Which game are you playing?

Guilds with players who play on both sides

[Airwaves]

Everyone on the aussie realms just call it Lust for horde and Hero for alliance.

[Segus1992]

Usually people just say bloodlust independent of faction or class, and everybody gets what it is about.
Me, I don't really care. Call it Time Warp, Heroism, Ancient Hysteria (sp?), whatever. My friends usually just say "pop BL" or something like that.

I mean yeah, this. The original skill was Bloodlust, so therefore the original name is also Bloodlust regardless of faction.

- - - Updated - - -

For the 80th time in this thread.. Lust was introduced in TBC when both factions had shamans. Trying to look cool doesn't work when you don't know what you're talking about

Technically Bloodlust is a reference to the WC3 Orc unit though, and Heroism is an Allianceified version of it. So no, you're wrong.

[Greengrim]

For the 80th time in this thread.. Lust was introduced in TBC when both factions had shamans. Trying to look cool doesn't work when you don't know what you're talking about

Bloodlust is a thing since Warcraft II and III buddy... And it WAS INDEED exclusive to ogres (non-faction) and shamans (Horde only).

[cparle87]

It's bloodlust, it's based off the rts game ability bloodlust a horde ability from ogre magi in wc2 and then shaman in wc3.

It also doesn't matter what you call it, if your only option of it is a mage they won't cast it no matter what you call it.



It wasn't in vanilla, specifically because shaman weren't on the alliance.

It wasn't in vanilla because it wasn't in vanilla because shaman didn't learn it until 70.

[Zka]

Pretty sure even the alliance calls it lust most of the time.

We are horde and often call it hero

[Yes but actually no]

It wasn't in vanilla because it wasn't in vanilla because shaman didn't learn it until 70.

They didn't learn it until 70 because the alliance didn't get shamans until tbc therefore they couldn't give bloodlust to a single faction, what part of this is hard for you to grasp so much that you so had to quote me?

[cparle87]

They didn't learn it until 70 because the alliance didn't get shamans until tbc therefore they couldn't give bloodlust to a single faction, what part of this is hard for you to grasp so much that you so had to quote me?

Your argument is that no shaman had lust in vanilla because it was a Horde-only race and that wouldn't have been fair? Way to make an argument that cannot be proven. You do realize by your logic they shouldn't have given any powerful buffs to paladins because Horde couldn't have them? Here's some reading on the subject for you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

[Felarion]

It's bloodlust since ogre mage abilisty in wc2 (don't remeber if ability was present in wc1)

[Yes but actually no]

Your argument is that no shaman had lust in vanilla because it was a Horde-only race and that wouldn't have been fair? Way to make an argument that cannot be proven. You do realize by your logic they shouldn't have given any powerful buffs to paladins because Horde couldn't have them? Here's some reading on the subject for you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

The only argument is you looking for one. Fuck off.

[vitor210]

It's Heroism. Why would anyone NOT want to do something heroic, and prefer to have lust in their blood, is beyond me. Also, people that call for Timewarp or drums have a special place in hell for them, like the ones that say "toon" instead of character as if we're watching a cartoon show. Or say "DD" (damage dealer) instead of DPS