Can some one link all shadowlands leaks with features?
It's hardly confirmed given they (a) aren't Blizzard, and (b) don't show us the evidence they apparently have.
Most players don't even know the PTR exists. Blizzard had that YouTube video for the patch, but Blizzcon is a far better way of broadcasting their patch content to the masses.seems like a waste of blizzcon time to cover a patch that's already on the ptr, and the bosses being tested.
It became clear that it wasn’t realistic to try to get the audience back to being more hardcore, as it had been in the past. -- Tom Chilton
https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...1#post51767246
Don't worry about it. It's some moron reposting stuff from this forum.
The Diablo 4 leak seems legit to me so I'm convinced on that. I am wondering what compells us to the Shadowlands. What purpose and such. I mean sure I'm excited for it but...I gotta know the WHY.
#TeamLegion #UnderEarthofAzerothexpansion plz #Arathor4Alliance #TeamNoBlueHorde
Warrior-Magi
1: WoW Xpac
2: Diablo 4
3: Overwatch 2
4: New project or: Hearthstone / Starcraft 1 / 2 / whatever / WoW Classic / Warcraft 3 Reforged / Heroes of the Storm (if anyone still plays it) / Diablo Immortal
I mean, aside from the ''obvious panels'' there are still a shitton of games that Blizzard can also feature in any panel.
It certainly sounds dumb, but the title could still work with just Queen. Battle for Azeroth was meh as a name too, but the name payed off in the end, albeit a little different.
As it stands, with Dragon Isles involved in that leak, and Sylvanas on the front cover for B-con (Presumably taking a key role), the Queen lamenting here can be a play on multiple characters that may be involved.
Dragon Isles = Alextrasza would be involved. One 'Queen' that can lament.
Sylvanas = Obvious
Azshara = Still around after Ny'alotha and definitely goes off chasing another 'Throne'/'Seat of Power'. Same thing as Alextrasza.
It could just be a shitty title or, like Battle for Azeroth, a shitty title that will hold some story meaning to be brought up and mentioned later. (Like the 'True Battle for Azeroth').
Woke up and turns out the Shadowlands leak is still alive. good
Let's keep the hype train going and hit 1k
Just because the expansion is potentially called Shadowlands does not mean that is where the expansion takes place. I have already gone in-depth to why an entire expansion set in just the shadowlands is a bad idea, so i won't delve into it.
The previous predictions of Dragon isles>World revamp>Northrend revamp stand. If we get shadowlands as a place we can go to it will at most be a single zone or two, which fits perfectly with Dragon isles as a zone similar to Val'sharah, Northrend revamp as new zone/patch island or a world revamp as the same.
Will be interesting to see going forward though. At the very least we are guaranteed more of The Bolvar
The world revamp dream will never die!
Oh damn, another one confirmed from yesterday.
#1 Hype-Thread Shitposter - Overlord of the Hypethread
like i just said though, the fact that there's two "coming soon" panels the second day makes me think it's something new.
every other thing the second day just says hearthstone/overwatch/etc., it's all labled. even wow. this is the only thing that is still labled "coming soon" on the second day, AND it's on the mythic stage with over 2 hours of content.
Dismissing either the D4 leak or OW2 leak is probably unwise at this point, with the evidence that is now backing these up. The guy who wrote the OW2 article for ESPN is Rod Breslau/Slasher who knows his shit and probably has known about it for a while.
With the 3 WeakAuras original leaks likely being from the same source, this definitely has implications for the Shadowlands ad as well, but doesn't exactly confirm it yet.