Originally Posted by
Raelbo
Dude, as I already said, I was using the Toulmin method of argumentation to assess your argument. It's not my opinion that your argument is lacking. It is objectively lacking because it lacks the basic elements that are required to construct an argument. Hence why I keep focussing on the difference between an assertion and an argument.
We may not agree on matters of opinion. But the simple fact is that, to date, your "argument" to support the notion of "flying is cancer" is close to non-existent. I explained exactly why but clearly you have no interest in logically answering that because, simply put, you can't.