Why "unfortunately"? If they add it and you don't like it, don't... roll one? Surely you haven't liked EVERY class that Blizz has added. Not all of them are gonna be to your taste, it's just how it works.
Why "unfortunately"? If they add it and you don't like it, don't... roll one? Surely you haven't liked EVERY class that Blizz has added. Not all of them are gonna be to your taste, it's just how it works.
"I have watched the other races... I have seen their squabbling, their ruthlessness. Their wars do nothing but scar the land, and drive the wild things to extinction. No, they cannot be trusted. Only beasts are above deceit." - Rexxar
BRING ON THE TINKERS BABY!!!! yewwwwwwwww
Blood elves are our high elves - Chris Metzen
then again people did not like survival in legion complain for good reason same thing happen in bfa for good reason
players are not huge fan of doing a outlaw rouge change to 1 spec on hunter even blizzard idmits they went to far
and as i said there are time classes lose identity when it is forced to be simlair to something else
as i said befor the are races as hunter dont support the idea of Ranger in hunter
then again if survival were to go more closer back in root like using duel wield weapon and ranged weapon like vanilla, tbc, wotlk and cata
and survival nature/poison, oil and fire is more immersive as attacks
people rather want ranger to be its own thing but they only see 1 spec possible on it and as i said befor i think blizzard should release sub classes with 1 spec
with all the allied race we have now that is gona work fine
and funny enof outlaw culd perfectly go to becom a pirat class and start with 1 spec or maby 2 if we take most of the survival stuff over and change the poison stuff nature stuff the harpoon and bomb wuld go well with pirat and spear
Last edited by Dragtox; 2019-10-21 at 08:33 AM.
I will play it to try it out, if gameplay is good i will continue playing it. I don't find it particularily interesting in the theme, nor am I fond of gnomes. Both gnomes and engineering and goblins have always been treated as a side joke, which is good as a side story. Making it into a focus point is meh.
I don't know about that. What I do know, is that Bard, as a class, could at least have a unique style of attacking if handled right. That the abilities you use have to be in order, and deal more damage when performed perfectly. It would have to be balanced to not be too tedious or confusing, and wouldn't necessarily be random (set combinations do different effects). But the idea of buffing and supporting a group would be rough outside of healing.
If we're comparing Bard to Tinker, I'm fully against it. If we're comparing bard to other classes in WoW with rich lore backgrounds, such as Necromancer, I'm still probably somewhat against it. But standing on its own, I'm not against bard, if they pull a MoP and add a ton of new lore to justify its existence--and design the class well.
That's my main issue, really. "Omg let's do bard instead of [other class]." Make it so it's not a competition and you'll get more interest. But a large part of the problem is the OP making a negative thread about a new class to begin with, so I guess it's inevitable.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah, I mean I'd argue that Monk was just a really good fit for the expansion. Rather than the expansion had been made for Monk, I'd argue that the expansion idea had been made, and with a small adjustment monk was easily doable. Though, who knows besides Blizzard for sure?
Ultimately though, I agree on basically all of this. And I certainly agree that adding music as a social component would be outstanding.
y i know bard needs lore for it and we already know blizzard have not added much for it + it kunda wuld be wierd if there was a expansion based on music alone but then again if tinker/machinist comes maby they make instruments with sonic sound effect attack etc but cant see much of it happan yet tho
and no i am not saying its gona be a spec to machinist/tinker
Last edited by Dragtox; 2019-10-21 at 09:26 AM.
I'm not saying a bard class is impossible, for the record. I'm saying that it wouldn't be based on something like ETC. Tech isn't used to create music in Warcraft in general. There is a lot of singing, though. I could imagine some dreamy singer class casting spells to damage/sleep/mind control/heal etc, but black metal tauren as a legitimate class is just too much imo.
i am saying the rock guitar thing is what it gona be based on dont know abut singing probly wuld happen anyways
and if engineering were to make a like a special guitar wich makes you attack with sound wave with the guitar that wuld be a intresting spec thing if you catch my drift here
we know we need more lore as i said again + i think enigneering lore can help guitar as weapon to add sonic sound wave based attack
and does not meen i am wrong that becus wow is heavly based horde around metal rock that i am wrong that the rock guitar thing wont happen it wuld fit the theme of universe more
There are other easter eggs like dances, NPC voice lines, etc. The actual in-game music is stuff like Lament of the Highborne, though. If they start making classes based on modern music or pop culture, people will be very upset. It undermines the feel of the Warcraft universe. If a bard spell or talent makes a reference to ETC, I won't be remotely surprised, but if I see this dude killing raid bosses with power slides, I'll have to assume that Blizzard has given up on creating an immersive game world.