PROUD TRUMP SUPPORTER, #2024Trump #MAGA
PROUD TRUMP CAMPAIGN SUPPORTER #SaveEuropeWithTrump
PROUD SUPPORTER OF THE WALL
BLUE LIVES MATTER
NO TO ALL GUNCONTROL OR BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EUROPE
/s
I am perfectly fine if they want to do a "Kelvin timeline" version of WoW where they just... do something other than the Burning Crusade, both plot wise and design wise. Keep iterating on level 60, or raise cap but instead of Outland you open new zones on Azeroth. Level 60 Karazhan raid, etc.
All it takes is to do it as a different servier you can COPY, not transfer, your Classic characters onto.
You do realise that not EVERYONE who wanted classic wanted it to be a pure untouched classic right?
Theres not just 1 social club that everyone is in that plays Classic.
Infact, its possible that the people who scream for a untouched classic are just the vocal MINORITY.
If subs start dropping theres a real possibility a Classic+ will start up.
you all wanted buggy classic servers now you got em now you want new classic content?? that's not happening
Bring on Classic-, 1bit ASCII only, acoustic coupler required for play.
How about No, please? We just have classic released and you expecting more asap.. Please be patient or move on to different game.
Except they weren't retconned? 90 - 95% of them left the Alliance in WC3. The one's that didn't follow Kael'thas to outlands went back to Quel'thalas to retake it. In BC they joined the horde, in hopes of re-uniting with Kael'thas.
What you've seen, is just a story moving forward naturally.
"Classic+" won't happen, because there's too many people who want different things, and too many who just want the old vanilla experience.
Besides, QOL updates for Classic just lead to...what the game is now. So I'd suggest to play that instead if you want Classic+. It will even have the same level cap in the next expansion
And then people will complain that they dared to change the game and will go back to making private servers (hell, there's people complaining that Classic as it is, is too different) or that Classic+ didn't turn out how they expected and they'll be screaming for Classic++, Retail-, or some other bullshit.
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Also, it's should HAVE. NOT "should of". "Should of" doesn't even make sense. If you think you should own a cat, do you say "I should of a cat" or "I should have a cat"? Do you HAVE cats, or do you OF cats?
They did leave the Alliance officially but in practice they still had ties and many High elves were in the Alliance. I.E the Dalarani High elves and the Priests in Wc3.
There was no mention of Blood elves trying to retake Quel'thalas until TBC afaik. During Vanilla you had Alliance High elves in great numbers in the lodges and such, and neutral/hostile Blood elves, with strong implications the Blood elves came from Outland and served Illidan.
People who advocate for Classic+ should be put in front of a firing squad.
Why on Earth would Blizzard want to reinvent the wheel and commit to maintaining THREE different versions of their game? That makes absolutely no business sense on any level. If subs do drop significantly, Blizzard will simply issue a "we told you so" statement and shut the Classic servers down.
Was the "you think you know what you want" guy right all along then?
i would love classic+, IF classic+ means „change nothing but modernize/improve class design“.
BUT: the magic in the statement above is the „I“ at the beginning. because classic+ asks for the following questions, i am sure 50% answer with yes and 50% with no:
- flying yes/no ?
- transmog yes/no ?
- QoL changes yes/no ?
- lfg tool yes/no ?
- achievements yes/no ?
- respec costs yes/no ?
...