The audience score that is consistently brigaded and completely without any objective merit whatsoever?
Why would I ever give any credence to that figure? Critics are professionals who do this for a living, and have standards they're held to. You might disagree with a given critic, sure, but if the critics are all saying that a film is "fine", and you're insisting it's absolute garbage crap bullshit, it's pretty clear who the crank is; it's the rando on the Internet rather than the collective opinion of all major critics.
You're literally arguing there's a grand conspiracy among critics, based on nothing. Conspiracy-theory nonsense isn't an argument.
Heck, here's the Google reviews link; https://www.google.com/search?q=obi-wan+kenobi+reviews
I want to point at the graph, and how the majority of viewers rank it as 5 stars, with a smattering of 2-3-4 reviews, and then a massive spike of 1-stars. That's what brigading looks like, when there's a sudden burst of 1-star reviews.
By comparison, here's A Phantom Menace's page; https://www.google.com/search?q=phantom+menace+reviews
No big spike of 1-stars, because there's no effort to brigade it. Just a natural curve.
Or for a current example, the Mandalorian; https://www.google.com/search?q=mandalorian+reviews
No spike of 1-stars. No brigading.
The Mandalorian was way better. It deserves that nearly-perfect scoring. Obi-Wan Kenobi was fine, though. I can't take you seriously if you're claiming it was "garbage", because that's simply not accurate, and you're clearly pushing an agenda that has nothing to do with the actual show.