turalyon.
being characterized as the ultimate suprematist in w2 and still being considered a goody 2 shoes in legion for the horde is just too much.
i can even pass the other 4 with him
turalyon.
being characterized as the ultimate suprematist in w2 and still being considered a goody 2 shoes in legion for the horde is just too much.
i can even pass the other 4 with him
1) Any Void Elf
2) Nathanos
3) Golden's Jaina
4) Vereesa
5) Tyrande
1. Illidan 2. Tyrande/Malfurion 3. Varian 4. Kalecgos 5. Vereesa/Valeera
Moderator of the General Off-Topic, Politics, Lore, and RP Forums
"If you have any concerns, let me know via PM. I'll do my best to assist you."
1) Vereesa Windrunner
2) Vereesa Windrunner (I really, really hate that character^^)
3) Wrathion (although I can bear him at the moment, he's still unnecessary and stupid)
4) Lucan Foxblood (now that Aucald reminded me of him )
5) Me'dan
That's mellow dramatic and extremely exaggerated.
Sylvanas wanted to kill everyone on the horde, Baine wanted to free the horde and stop the pointless war with the alliance, and he killed a few Sylvanas aligned horde in the process. Would you prefer being a corpse?
You compared Azshara being allied to the Legion (two chaotic evil organizations, bent on destroying everything) with Baine's resistance helping the alliance stop the war (who are both good).
Your comparison itself is absurd.
You are looking from wrong perspective. The fact that Sylvanas had her secret agenda doesn't make Baine right. He wasn't aware of her plans. If we can go this way, genocide on Draenei was right because AU Yrel is mad. And yes, I would prefer being a corpse to having to apologise for Teldrassil.
Azshara allied with Legion which happened to be right on the end. But of course, that means nothing to our discussion and to Azshara herself. She didn't care about anything but her marital status but neither did Baine. Alliance is too evil organisation, as we can see by acts of violence commited against orcs, undead, blood elves and, of course, goblins. What makes Genn better than Sylvanas' official image?
1 - Nathanos
2 - Aggra
3 - pretty much everyone else, they're all cringy
/s
Wait... after like... 10 years are people STILL bothered by Pandaren? I mean... let it go. It's not Lord of the Rings.
Badly written? I wouldn't think so, myself. I don't like Anduin as a character myself, I think he's overwhelmingly naive and unrealistically optimistic, but those are character flaws that actually make him a realistic and fallible person, not "bad writing" in and of themselves.
You can certainly dislike a character that's otherwise written well. I have similar thoughts about Sylvanas, as well; she's a great character and I absolutely loathe who she is and what she does as a fictional person in the Warcraft universe.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead