The argument that he wasn’t willfully going into harms way, is absurd. Being aggressive is not as easy target, as it’s what he did to preemptively defend him self, that points to what he was expecting to happen.
- - - Updated - - -
There is no law that defines the will to shoot people... that’s absurd...
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
And the DA will likely enter an objection to the Defense's claim. Yes, it leads to evidence he was a violent man, but even if he was a violent man doesn't mean that Rittenhouse's actions were justified. I can have a violent action in the past, but doesn't mean I was currently acting violent.
Rittenhouse is a little muddier because it shows that he has a habit of overreacting to a situation and jumping to violence ... which DOES call into question a claim for self defense. They have to show that Rosenbaum was at the time he was shot was a clear potential danger to cause great bodily harm or death at the time to Rittenhouse, not merely a possible danger.
Peace is a lie. There is only passion. Through passion I gain strength. Through strength I gain power.
Through power I gain victory. Through victory my chains are broken. The Force shall set me free.
–The Sith Code
Yeah he was there to help.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75uw...ature=youtu.be at 3:13 you can see him running around with fire extinguisher.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oQlnihfxhU at 1:40 he is saying that he is EMT and asking if a wounded woman needs help.
"He went out there looking to shoot people" is false narrative. Even when he was on ground and attacked by 3 people he didnt to try to shoot the last one when he retreated and only shot him when he pointed his gun at him and tried to murder him.
They are trying to smear this kid just like they tried to smear Nick Sandmann few months before.
Democratic Socialist Convention : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPLQNUVmq3o
Yeah, he was carrying that gun, to shoot dirt off buildings. Let’s just ignore that the protest are due to a man getting shot in the back several times, because cops thought he had a gun. While if they asked this “kid” walking around with an AR 15, his age... no one would be dead and this “kid” would still be in jail.
Last edited by Felya; 2020-09-03 at 12:04 PM.
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
He isn’t an idiot... he is just a 17 year old, that had to be driven by his mom... This is literally why kids are not permitted to drive, drink, smoke and join the military. It’s not because they are idiots, it’s because they are immature.
Edit: His mom on the other hand, is a grade A fucking moron.
Edit 2: “He felt threatened”... no shit, it’s a 17 year old, out past his bed time, outside his home town, at night, running around by him self. If him being threatened justifies self defense, the kid could have just started shooting everything.
Last edited by Felya; 2020-09-03 at 12:10 PM.
Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
Well, just because he did other things while he was there, does mean he wasn't also looking to shoot someone. One does not exclude the other from being true. It is like saying someone can't go into a restaurant for food and to rob the place. They are mutually exclusive reasons.
For example, he could have gone to help counter protesters and shoot the BLM protesters. It isn't a false narrative because you found him helping people, it is an unproven narrative, which is different. False means you have provided evidence to the contrary of the narrative, you have none. But since the side pushing the narrative have effectively no evidence, their narrative is unproven.
Peace is a lie. There is only passion. Through passion I gain strength. Through strength I gain power.
Through power I gain victory. Through victory my chains are broken. The Force shall set me free.
–The Sith Code
No, he was. A MAGgAt was answering dear leaders call to arms to take 2A action as he has since day 1. You dont take an assault weapon across state lines to "defend" something that isn't yours, when you are have been indoctrinated on protestors are the bad guys, without the intent to use it.
But you seem to live outside of reality.
- - - Updated - - -
Got a source? Even if it was, it was illegal for him to carry it. He still went to violent scene with a gun to do what? Please.
Firefighters and EMTs don't go into situations to help people while armed. They don't show up with a white nationalist militia, locked, loaded and ready for conflict.
Rittenhouse and the militia he was with were there for one reason and one reason only, engage in violent conflict. Them saying they were there to just "help" carried less weight than their actions.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
It's absurd because he himself said in an interview he's going into harm's way.
- - - Updated - - -
Just yesterday I linked you an interview with Kyle where he himself states he's going into harm's way.
You're just trolling at this point, aren't you?
So instead of illegally getting a gun across state lines, someone else illegally gave a 17 year old a weapon and is an accessory to his crimes. He is still guilty of using a firearm without a license in another state it's just now he has to sell someone else out to lessens his charges.
First of all, you're literally just vomiting out right wing talking points, and it's clear given you're linking videos by Mark Dice and Collion Noir.
One's a conspiracy theorist and wingnut, whilst the other is a gun toting lunatic who thinks everything becomes better when ammo is involved.
Furthermore, asking if someone is okay or claiming to be an EMT or running around with a fire extinguisher does not absolve someone of murder.
As far as trying to 'smear' is concerned. This boy murdered people. His life was NOT in danger. Doesn't matter whether any or all of the victims had sketchy pasts, it's not within his remit to take lives. So please, drop the bad faith bullshit and call it what it is.
If you're so interested in pearl clutching, you wouldn't be opposing a movement looking for criminal justice reforms. But here you are anyway.
He's seen running with a fire extinguisher not putting out fires.
So, if i'm following you correctly......
running with a fire extinguisher and asking someone if they are ok > shooting 3 people, killing 2 and being part of a white nationalist militia.
Yeah, he's fucking hero.....
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown