I wouldn't call pepper spray or mace a "chemical weapon" but I suppose being over dramatic is in vogue. Mind you, you won't find me defending cops (or macing kids for that matter) but if you've been to a violent protest or a riot, or even watched one, you know things can go from 1 to 100 pretty fucking fast. Getting the spicy eyes is pretty low on the scale of bad things that could happen.
Whilst this has been true at points in history, it doesn't always hold true and it certainly holds less truth the closer to current year we get, as societies have become less violent and more accepting of concepts of human rights. And it certainly isn't true that violent revolution always leads to anything better, or that they all start as riots. Violence is not necessary for change, change can happen without it. Sadly though too many times this isn't the case, but it isn't correct to say that it is necessary.
And I would be careful about advocating for violence. It is fine to advocate for violence against people you don't like/don't know, but you are also advocating for violence against yourself and people you do care about, and I wonder how many people grasp this. You don't know how things will turn out, maybe the change that is being chased might end up demanding that you, or your loved ones must be physically harmed, I imagine when that happens many people will start to question the necessity of violence at that point.
I dunno, am I comparing yet another data point in a centuries' long campaign of oppression, exploitation, and erasure by white people against minority groups in the US (many of whom were either forcibly annexed or transported here) to another data point in a centuries' long campaign of oppression, exploitation, and erasure by white people against people in Indochina?
Big if true. Colonialism is an overseas expression of the same animus that motivates domestic racial injustice in the US.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
I suppose it would be pretty cliched for me as a white person to equate racial justice with ethnic cleansing.
But thanks for voicing this, because we're really getting into the heart of people's resistance to reform.
They're scared that any gains for blacks means losses for whites. Which, hun, is a form of racism.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Ah, of course. Pepper spray, napalm. What's the difference right?
I am sure the outcome of Minneapolis is going to be that everyone magically turns not racist. Nothing has quite ever said "let's love each other" like a Molotov Cocktail to your face.
All I see from where I am sitting from is yet another short circuit reaction from US citizens. It doesn't matter if I can understand the anger or not. This will change nothing, like nothing changed from all the other times before. Your problems are rooted so deep in your society that this won't even scratch the surface.
Next racist cop will kill another black dude within the next 12 months, I promise.
Last edited by StayTuned; 2020-05-31 at 12:49 AM.
Who did the shop keepers oppress? Who were the black business owners oppressing? How will destroying their lives get rid of said oppression? Why will it work this time when it didn't work before? The violence isn't being directed solely at the ones doing the oppression. That is the problem with mindless violence. When it gets to a riot stage, it becomes mindless violence, and even if it does end up being a catalyst for an overall positive change, harming innocent people in the chase for justice doesn't put you in the right, do the innocents harmed in this pursuit of justice have any right to demand justice for them?