It ain't Camden or Newark but it's definitely not much better
crime rate that is higher than 80% of the state's cities and towns of all sizes.
You realise that doesn't help you right? If a slave master... a person who literally owns black people, can fall in love with a black woman.... trying to say you hold no bias because you have some brown women you've loved is folly.
Your hate of the place that is 80% latino that is literally one of the safest areas in NJ, you call garbage can and has tons of crime. On what basis? Too many latinos? I mean how do you look at a place and then say "too much crime tons of crime!!" what because lots of people speak Spanish and are a little too dark? There is no basis for this claim, yet you made it, and it was entirely false, and we have stats to prove this the case.
What's even more hilarious is that you called rutherford a mostly white town WITH A HIGHER CRIME RATE nice and safer... which is fucking false. On what basis???
On what basis did you decide that a mostly white town, with a higher crime rate is "safer" than the mostly latino town with a lower crime rate????????
This, right here is a perfect example of your bias and how having a partner that is "Latino" doesn't suddenly mean you can't be bias or racist against brown people.
" If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
“ The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams
"Which is an even more extreme example"
That isn't comparing them to slave holders, also I do not see your name in bolded green.
And do you have nothing to say on them finding a mostly white town "safer" when it has a higher crime rate than the most latino town? Or is it totally normal to go around calling mostly latino towns with low crime rates, garbage cans, and mostly white towns with higher crime rates nice and safe???
You numbers are quite a bit different than other's I've seen but are you literally saying that this town that falls below the national average is somehow crime ridden? Accoridng to your own fucking link they're below average crime.
The likely fact they count crime per square mile into this is probably why they have it ranked lowly, which is a stupid way to think about things considering it is one of the most densely populated places in the entire country.
- - - Updated - - -
You mean the one that shows union city is still well below national average for crime?
Let's note what they say about Weehawken an area next to union city that according to that site has rates of violent crime below njs own. That site is factoring in square miles to get a determination of the store which is silly.
Do explain how "union city isn't far from from Camden" makes sense in a world were Union City has crime rates BELOW the national average and Camden is sitting at. 4x the national average??????? Does that make fucking sense to you? According again to that link shadow is using.
In fact that own link says crime rates for violence alone are 466% HIGHER in Camden yet Union City is "not far" above Camden??????
Last edited by Themius; 2020-07-19 at 05:51 PM.
Things may have incrementally improved in the past couple years, but the numbers aren't cheery.
did you totally ignore national average??
It's in the link, did you not read it?
National - 4 Union city - 3.47
Property crime
National - 24 Union City - 16.58
- - - Updated - - -
Why are you trying to paint a town that has about 15% less crime than the national average as some crime ridden place not far from Camden.. an area that has crime rates that are some 460% higher???? Like are you even thinking?
Looking at crime and having national crime rate at 100, Union City scores 85. You somehow have taken a city that is 15% below average and are holding it up as a crime ridden place.
That is only a skill conservatives have.
Last edited by Themius; 2020-07-19 at 05:56 PM.
Well that's a bunch of lies, if that were the case you would see numbers that surpass average, not fall below them.
Also from that image
And what exactly constitutes a city to these people? Are they even considering density?The 2018 crime rate in Union City, NJ is 153 (City-Data.com crime index), which is 1.8 times lower than the U.S. average.
Hey did you realise that you ignored once again that the national rate is again higher and worse than Union city and that union city still falls well below national average? I mean you seem to be ignoring this to paint a place with below average crime as some sort of crime ridden hell hole.
When their crimes according to your own links falls below average. And according to the source of the image is 1.8x lower than average. Why do you keep ignoring this to call a place with less than average crime crime ridden????
So let's get this straight.
Union City - A city with crime below national averages is... "crime ridden garbage" despite having crime rates that about some 15% below national average and by your own link 1.8x lower rates than national average???
So Union City is crime ridden hell hole with crime below average. Oh yeah that makes lots of sense.
On display here, we have the issue. This right here shows how easy it is for white people to be in a bubble and entirely ignore systemic racism, and issues about cops as they relate to minorities. Instead they turn it into a pity party about them, and try to say it's the minorities that are the problem.
Last edited by Themius; 2020-07-19 at 06:04 PM.