Looks like one of the guys involved in the Nazario incident has already been fired. Wonder why his situation was different from the other guy, and why they both haven't been fired. Wonder if they'll see assault charges.
Looks like one of the guys involved in the Nazario incident has already been fired. Wonder why his situation was different from the other guy, and why they both haven't been fired. Wonder if they'll see assault charges.
Can you guys please keep this stuff to your countries? I don't need a bunch of entitled college brats telling us we can't have statues of Pericles, Leonidas, Alexander the Great, Plato, Socrates because they offend someone. I won't tell you what statues to put up in Portland, promise.
Also, didn't rioters in Wisconsin tear down a statue of an abolitionist?
Yeah, here it is.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/isabelt...h=31547aa86961
Guess they just saw a statue of a white guy and that was enough.
It's a good first step, so I'm delaying judgement.
Depends on the location, but it looks like the pepper spray might be a felony (though the statutes that might apply have some major wiggle), but the other one looks like a misdemeanor barring the proximity of certain buildings. Still, charge em and let the courts sort it.
This also seems to assume that people only become more empathetic as time goes on it moves in both directions just look at isis the other group using violence and fear to spread a message.
I will always look at those trying to tear down history as foolish. Erasing the past isn't effect. It's one thing for a monument to fall to disrepair but for them to be torn down usually shows nothing but hubris and foolishness from those involved.
Another sentiment that probably sounds profound to the people saying it, but in reality is utterly meaningless. Tearing down statues isn't "erasing history."
The only people who want us to forget our past are those trying to get us to fixate on the destruction of stone and bronze instead of the centuries of subjugation (and continuing social and political issues) those monuments represent.
Last edited by s_bushido; 2021-04-12 at 04:02 AM.
Tearing down statues is not "tearing down history", and does not in any way "erase the past".
It simply ends the continued celebration of that particular figure or event.
The historical record is not in any way negatively impacted by removing statues. Nobody forgets who Hitler was because there are no more Hitler statues around. It's a completely ridiculous and empty argument, and I do not for one second think you actually believe it to be true. It's just a cover story, so you don't have to speak your real mind. It's too completely ridiculous an idea for it to be an honestly-held belief.
You suffer from inability to understand or even think through this situation we are talking about here.
Tearing down statues of slavers... "oh no that's crazy!!" says the white guy... yet you don't realise how ridiculous that is?
Did you think tearing down hitler statues was crazy?
I'm not getting involved in the madness of your guys' politics anymore. I'm just asking you to keep it in your countries and not come tearing down statues in Greece or other countries. I shudder to think how much property damage "social justice protesters" could do with so many statues everywhere in Greece. So do what you will, just keep it there.
It doesn't, as stated people will favor those with similar ideals to themselves. If you have a figure that doesn't match up, they'll likely not stay up. See Mao in China. Once a hero and now people are allowed to criticize him a little more freely. He doesn't match up.
The rest doesn't really have anything to do with the context of what happened or what I said.
Exactly. That's how it's always been. Your local museums cycle through pieces for the same reasons, art has relevance to those who give it.
Last edited by Rozz; 2021-04-12 at 04:16 AM.
Moderator of the General Off-Topic, Politics, Lore, and RP Forums
"If you have any concerns, let me know via PM. I'll do my best to assist you."
In both cases, you're talking about statues damaged during protests that lashed out in violence. Neither statue was targeted for what it represented.
That's just a naked false equivalence to the official tearing down of statues because those they represent were slavers or Confederates.
It's still idiotic.
If I went and burned down Kemal Ataturk's museum in Thessaloniki because he actually carried out ethnic cleansing; arguably far worse than the crimes committed by many of the people made statues of, it wouldn't change one fucking thing. It wouldn't correct a single crime committed. I don't really care about confederate statues, I don't really care about American ethnic relations any more than the average American cares about what was done in my corner of the world (not at all, since you westerners keep supporting the nation that did those things). But honestly, it just seems like impotent tantrums to target statues.
Moderator of the General Off-Topic, Politics, Lore, and RP Forums
"If you have any concerns, let me know via PM. I'll do my best to assist you."
I suppose it would seem near hysterical to think people would rather historical moments exist rather then nothing but a vandalozed fondation. It is ridiculous isn't it. We are far better of destroying things to please a mob that doesn't really grasp what it doing. Unless your telling me there is a rymthe and reason to them destroying an all black regiment memorial?
All I can do is shake my head at you. I can forgive those fools to an extent. Children lashing out will always be destructive as they tantrum but you like to hold yourself aloft of them. Excusing them or trying to cover...well that measures a man.