curious of definition of balance in this case
is it
*All classes are capable and wanted for all forms of PVP and PVE and able to perform well in them
or
*MY class does 2% less dps than Class Y AGAIN DAMN YOU BLIZZARD YOU RUINED IT
curious of definition of balance in this case
is it
*All classes are capable and wanted for all forms of PVP and PVE and able to perform well in them
or
*MY class does 2% less dps than Class Y AGAIN DAMN YOU BLIZZARD YOU RUINED IT
This is why there is so much negative sentiment about Monks right now.
A couple of months ago: "Wow Monks are the only spec with no blue post or major changes so far. I hope they manage to help Monks before the expansion comes"
A few weeks ago: Blue post saying "We will work on Monks but we first have to get rid of their bugs so we can work on them properly. We will bring the new Monk changes in the next week"
A couple of weeks later: "Monks are heavily nerfed now"
Now: "Still no major changes, no buffs, no talent fixes, still 100% of the problems carried over from Legion and BFA. Also, they are now only doing a small number of minor balance changes"
This is why Monks are worried.
-
No good deed goes unpunished!
-
It's almost like balancing is ongoing right up until Mythic raid launches.
Starting to think those X year member tags under people's names are lying.
Scheduled weekly maintenance caught me by surprise.
That was true until BFA, where Shamans, Druids, Priests, Warriors were told that they will be fixed in 8.1 because Blizzard ran out of time. Even worse, when 8.1 actually came, they were told again that they ran out of time due to Azerite trait balancing and the classes were given just number changes.
Loss of trust often results in these kinds of posts
-
No good deed goes unpunished!
-
It's almost like someone always says this and basically nothing changes at all, especially for some classes that are completely broken or totally untouched. Specs that weren't even finished and get delayed and delayed until they redo them in .1 or .2 patches. How many expansions have you played that you're not aware of it? I think BFA was the first expansion that had the most blue posts for balance passes I'd ever seen after expansion launch, yes, yet plenty of specs still were forgotten.
It's like when they ask for beta feedback and listened to zero of it after every single beta. When, in PvP, there was a completely busted warrior/hunter comp that deleted people instantly that got through beta, through live, and wasn't changed very deep into the season. So, you know, people tend to be skeptical of balance despite "It's not even release patch lole" Benefit of the doubt only works if you have a history of following through early enough for it to matter
Last edited by La; 2020-09-17 at 05:22 AM.
*Insert every single ridiculous PC parts detail here that no one cares about*
That's probably because there hasn't fucking been any. Doing beta testing without an NDA is proving more and more each day to be a mistake, because people who have no idea what they're talking about feel the need to chime in with their valueless opinions.
And, before you all jump and screech about how there "has been balancing", it's a well established fact at this point that actual balance and tuning continues right up until Heroic week on live and sometimes even after that.
I mean for fuck's sake, seriously?
They've done a little bit of balancing but there's a lot still to be done. At the moment affliction locks, mages and shadow priests are doing really well on beta. I've been in a number of betas and the general rule is that classes that seem overpowered a month before release get the biggest nerf bat - and go from fotm to not played a lot. Think demonology locks before bfa - they dominated in bfa beta and were over nerfed and it took a long time before they were competitive again in Bfa. You can expect the nerf bat to hit affliction locks (I don't want that, I play a lock and a monk (healer and dps)). Im not a high end raider (my limit is heroic) so I have more freedom to pick classes based on their playstyle rather than performance ranking. I was going to drop lock - but affliction now plays closer to what it used to and is a style I really like. The Bfa incarnation of affliction lock made me want to abandon the class. I also like windwalker and monk healing. They are both playing well on beta but windwalker still seems like a spec that won't get picked a lot because of its dps ranking - while monk healers will be very good for mythic+ again.
IT is good, it would be a problem if it was balanced towards the first patches.
The game needs to be balanced towards the endgame of the expansion and not towards its first half.
Achieving full balance is impossible.
Just because specific specs are getting a large volume of changes doesn't mean they're in a good place.
Balance druids have had LOTS of changes over alpha/beta but the spec is still fairly meh at the minute, especially after the latest build which pushed through nerfs and questionable changes to Lunar Eclipse.
Number tweaking will continue all the way to S1, I'll certainly keep my options open with alts in case shit hits the fan but it's far too early for doom and gloom.
O love how people complain about balance yet they have absolutly nothing but their own speculation on it. You have no numbers, you havent played beta with its all systems at all yet somehow you all claim pretty much every single class as unbalanced. I really wonder where do you get your data.
Class balancing? Where?
Wasn't it said more balancing is coming? I am still waiting for that, we're just about over a month from launch and they still have done almost nothing in that regard. Plus a ton of not working or incredibly useless Covenant skills.
- - - Updated - - -
This is basically every spec besides Shadow Priest.
_______
People that keep saying it's just beta (when we're just over a month from launch) amaze me.
MAGA - Make Alliance Great Again