The "scientific community" is not the "basic human rights defiler community". Also, who said anything about that person being the "only one"? Are you saying that only one person in the entire world would have supernatural powers?
Why didn't they, then? Why now suddenly there's this worry of "if they could get away with it"? What makes you think they'd have an easier time "getting away with it" murdering one man?You haven't been paying very much attention if you honestly are making that comparison. Especially BLM. I mean, fuck, the Trump admin was literally ready to sic the military on them if they could get away with it, and they did have cops out there using extreme force "rubber bullets to the face, shoot first, arrest second, ask questions twenty third" style in a lot of those protests. The only reason they weren't straight up killing people is because you don't generally do that in polite society.
Except I wasn't talking solely about governments when I spoke about the world's eyes. It was also the people, and the non-gov organizations.Also, "the entire world at large" literally disagrees strongly with this assertion, as there are countries all over the globe who are willing AND able to use lethal force to subdue destabilizing elements. China for one.
Yes! Russia and China will tremble because the US have a guy in their pockets who can levitate small objects with his mind!Just because one government might manage to use them in a positive way doesn't mean that every OTHER government isn't going to view them being attached to the first as a direct threat. If they throw their lot in with the USA for example, China and Russia are likely going to take a dim view of another superpower having that kind of wildcard in it's pocket.
You presenting the power of social media only strengthens my case. Also, I never said "all the eyes of the world would be in a good light".Social media literally has 30% of the USA convinced that Vaccines are evil and part of a government conspiracy to turn you into 5g antennas or other dumbass shit. You honestly think, even for a second, that that would change in this instance? No way in hell the individual in question ends up "with all the eyes of the world on them in a good light" after the facebook trolls get wind of their existence.
Except it's very relevant. I never said fame would 100% protect them. You're the one postulating that if a guy with supernatural powers came forward into the light, they would die, despite having literally zero evidence of that. And then when you tried to counter my claim that fame can protect them, you said "yeah famous people die too" and then I asked how many of those die in comparison to how many are still alive. Hell, let's make it even better: how many famous people are being assassinated in comparison to those still alive. Famous people get protection. That is a fact.Completely irrelevant. You postulated that fame would protect them. I pointed out that there are literally dozens of examples (and that's probably pretty low) that directly refute your point.