Bojo made his political career from being two things, a bit of a clown, he made an image of being more fun than most conservatives and more liberal than most conservatives, apart from the brexit issue bojo voting wise wouldnt look out of place in either the labour or lib dem party on his voting record.
But being the leader of the conservatives that means taking the full flak that not even a Liberal record or fun loving image can protect against.
But I make this point repeatedly, bojo is as liberal as a conservative gets, you don't want to oust him as con leader because its more likely he will be replaced by some one far far worse.
- Christopher HitchensPopulists (and "national socialists") look at the supposedly secret deals that run the world "behind the scenes". Child's play. Except that childishness is sinister in adults.
Yep. And a massive cross, which I'm surprised they didn't burn.
And you had them making at least one noose out of the camera cabling they were trying to light a bonfire on...which they were very unsuccessful at. Apparently they haven't mastered the use of fire yet, so resorted to their primate instincts and just hit the stuff a bit.
Fair talk it didn't look like it could hold the weight of a normal person.
https://people.com/politics/dc-prote...7-61a0711c891b
Picture 6.
But we are still talking about the same kind of people who planned to kidnap and murder the governor of Michigan.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/ca...ge-01610061405
So Capitol Police Chief Sund (I guess that's his name...weird) turned down offers of backup from the Pentagon before the siege, and the DoJ during the siege.
He's resigning soon, but he should not be allowed to. Fire and investigate/prosecute him. His actions left multiple dead and risked the lives of members of Congress. He let insurrectionists storm the Capitol building.
A little comparison, USA & Ukraine riots, how some democrats react to riots..it's not about Ukraine, it could be any other country usa derailed the elected in..
"one rule for me and another for thee"
Also, this is a very long list
Last time Biden was in office...United States involvement in regime change has entailed both overt and covert actions aimed at altering, replacing, or preserving foreign governments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United..._regime_change
2014
https://www.rt.com/news/ukraine-clas...otest-law-858/
Washington has threated to impose sanctions against Ukraine as the White House called on the authorities to "de-escalate the situation," by withdrawing riot police and beginning a dialogue with the opposition.
"The increasing tension in Ukraine is a direct consequence of the government failing to acknowledge the legitimate grievances of its people," National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said in a statement.
"The US will continue to consider additional steps - including sanctions - in response to the use of violence," Hayden added.
Following Sunday’s riots, the Ukrainian police have opened a criminal case into the mass unrest in central Kiev. The police also said they have footage from CCTV cameras to analyze, warning that the aggressive protesters will be brought to justice. According to the new legislation, perpetrators may face up to 15 years in prison for “mass violation of public order,” as well as large fines.
So far, ten people have been arrested, the Ministry of Internal Affairs said in a statement naming the detainees.
The list includes a 30 -year-old member of "Svoboda" (Freedom) movement. He has a history of being apprehended several times for disorderly conduct. The list also includes a 41-year-old man nicknamed "Skull" who had previously been convicted of murder and served 13 years behind bars.
More violent than Americans storming capitol in US, here's Ukraininans doing the similar things but more violent, here's Kerry's take, never holds rioters responsible..https://www.rt.com/news/kiev-protest...n-clashes-873/
Ukrainian opposition leaders have threatened to “go on the offensive”, if the president does not respond to the demands in the wake of Wednesday’s talks not yielding any results. Meanwhile, rioters remain in central Kiev, causing unrest and damage.
"Tomorrow if the president does not respond ... then we will go on the offensive," said Vitaly Klitschko, one of the leaders, addressing the thousands of protesters on Independence Square, Maidan.
Following the three-hour long meeting with the President Victor Yanukovich, opposition leaders said there had been no positive response from the president to their demands, which include lifting the anti-riot laws, the government stepping down and an early ballot.
https://www.rt.com/news/kiev-rioters-chaos-police-167/
Meanwhile, US Secretary of State John Kerry once again confirmed Washington’s support for Ukrainian protesters during his speech at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland. Kerry said the US is working with its allies and top Ukrainian officials to end the violence.
“We are working with our partners to press the government of Ukraine to forego violence, to address the concerns of peaceful protesters, to foster dialogue, promote the freedom of assembly and expression,” he said.Yanukovych Repeals Anti-Protest Laws, Signs Amnesty Bill.
KIEV, January 31 (RIA Novosti) – Ukraine's President Viktor Yanukovych on Friday signed into law bills declaring an amnesty for demonstrators and canceling unpopular anti-protest laws, his press service said.
A series of anti-protest laws were pushed through parliament without discussion by the ruling pro-presidential Party of Regions on January 16, sparking renewed street protests that rapidly descended into violence between police and demonstrators.
In a bid to defuse the political crisis, parliament voted overwhelmingly earlier this week to cancel the unpopular bill and to release detained protesters.
It marked the first real concession by Yanukovych since the anti-government protests erupted in November after he rejected an association agreement with the European Union in favor of closer ties with Russia.
The amnesty law will only come into effect, however, if the opposition vacates occupied buildings and opens up roads that it has blocked in the center of the country's capital, Kiev.
The protesters will have 15 days to withdraw from Kiev streets once the law is published by the official media.
Opposition leaders have previously rejected this condition, however, as effectively creating a hostage situation in the country.Ofc, we saw how many here shrugged when BLM Antifa burned n rioted. I'm not addressing their reason, but their conduct.Ukraine riots according to Obama: 'Peaceful protesters' oppressed by govt.
It seems punishment for rioting should only meted out when the opposing side riots, when it's your guys, hands off..
Since the country is so divided, I expect Trump to pardon the protesters, if possible.
WTF MSNBC is literally showing videos of police escorting people, helping them walk, down the steps of the capital building as they are leaving and just letting them go.
Then playing it beside how BLM protestors are treated.
This is insane.
I never said rioters. Rioters are criminals.
What I was watching was people who went past rioting they were fucking terrorists being assisted by police every step of the way instead of being stopped and then that footage had been put beside brutality put against peaceful protestors.
That is what my post is about. Like Biden said rioters are criminals. You probably think you're clever here, but no you just want to equate protestors with rioters.
You seem to think that people are either for or against protests for the sake of being for or against protests. The idea that people are protesting for CERTAIN REASONS seems completely lost on you. Also, the manner in which the protestors conduct themselves is a huge factor.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
The FBI is already releasing a lot of person of interest mugshots. They are certainly on the ball
I 100% answered your question but it's clear now you didn't want an answer, you're just doing a gotcha question.
My post was about the treatment of the people engaged in the most unbelievable thing I've seen in my life yesterday and the treatment of peaceful protestors.
I'm not discussing the people who didn't enter the capital building.
When somebody says only "protesters" refusing to admit there were rioters also at any event that has both.
This selective seeing rioters in the opposing side and only protesters in ur own camp is a bias.
Ofc, most will not openly state "well, i like blm n antifa, any violence they do they should be allowed to get away with" but you see with how people structure their bias n deliberately avoid looking into the mirror.