Doing what? Passing two stimulus bills in the House and rejecting the absolutely pathetic Senate Republicans respons?
Someone hasn't been paying literally any attention to anything that's happened over the past 9 months on this topic.
Hello goal posts, weird of you to move hemispheres. I mean I get that you don't have an argument because you continue to show a fundamental lack of understanding of how Congress and the US government works. But like...dude, we're talking about "current year", like, the pandemic. Like, the next session of Congress.
If you want to complain about accelerationist Democrats over the past 50 years, create a thread and have a fuckin ball. But this ain't quite the thread for that.
I've been paying a lot of attention, I just get news from sources other then MSNBC. Yeah a Pandemic that Pelosi won't even put up M4A vote on to save her corporatist Democrats like herself. Same reason why Mitch bundle the stimulus increase to the section 230.
You can keep attacking me for not understanding government, when it's clear you only think one side of the government runs the entire thing.
- - - Updated - - -
Where did I only blame one party, I am blaming both parties and more importantly our elected leaders regardless of their team colors.
MMO-Champ the place where calling out trolls get you into more trouble than trolling.
Even the "fraud squad" is the enemy now because they didn't join a clown caucus like they had hoped. No reform for you since not a single congress person agree's with you on well anything it seems, because they actually want to help people instead of just pretending to. Thanks for the donations though!!! =)
This thread is about Pelsoi, so why would I bring up the GOP? I most certianly think they are beyond saving, and so I don't waste my time on a party I see as on it's death bed.
Also if I'm blaming dems for going along, then obviously I see the GOP pushing for it as a problem.
Last edited by Jettisawn; 2021-01-05 at 09:34 PM.
Shame @Noxx79 is afk I think they'd be enjoying the hell out of this.
See, this is a really nice way to deliver a personal attack on someone else?
Problem for you is I don't have cable, and don't watch or listen to MSNBC really outside of occasionally seeing one of their articles pop up.
I do enjoy that you're rather attack a strawman to dismiss my views rather than like...actually discuss the topics.
Because it wouldn't pass. Because it's a waste of time. Because there's more important shit they should be doing (but aren't, sadly) right now. Because trying to transition to M4A in the middle of a fucking pandemic when health care providers are already stretched thin and overwhelmed is about the dumbest idea of the decade, and we're only to years into this decade.
What reason? That he just wanted to add a poison pill while mollifying Trump? I mean, it was a smart political move on his part, and was his least bad option.
I've never attacked you, I've commented on your apparent lack of understanding and repeatedly encouraged your to research more so you can come to discussions better informed.
I don't, and never have. But since you're refusing to acknowledge that split-party control over the Senate allows both parties to pick and choose what legislation they want, and in this instance it's the Republicans who are holding up popular legislation, I'm not sure there's anywhere left for this discussion to go beyond, "You're wrong and you don't know what you're talking about."
Yeah why would we bring up the obstructionists when discussing something they are obstructing like 2k checks?