You're confusing "wants to take her company away from her" with my actual position, which is "is completely fine if she has to divest herself of ownership stakes".
I'm not responding to this lying bullshit further. I've explained how you're being dishonest, and that's all the response it deserves."Great, if she cannot get rid of the fetus any other way, I guess she'll have to keep it."
"If the minorities can't be bothered to jump through all those hoops, and wait in line for 8 hours to vote, then I guess they shouldn't vote."
So, you spoke of other alternatives, show me the math on how she can do it.
If you force someone off a bridge, you are killing her. If your only argument is... well, she could have flown away, then it's not a good one.
So, let me know when you an show how she can do anything else.
How long am I going to need to wait?
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Asked and answered. I didn't provide math because it's not a mathematical question.
Neither of us has a full breakdown of Snyder's net worth, anyway. Your napkin math was wrong because you presumed her only asset was In&Out, which is categorically false.
Forcing someone to jump off a bridge is harmful.If you force someone off a bridge, you are killing her. If your only argument is... well, she could have flown away, then it's not a good one.
Expecting a rich person to pay their taxes is not harmful.
Comparing the former to the latter is dishonest.
Do you have a detailed and itemized breakdown of Snyder's full net worth handy?
Because it's a question that's literally impossible to answer, mathematically, without such a breakdown.
I can do it, given the necessary data points. Neither of us have them. I'm just not the one trying to pretend my napkin math based on assumptions is somehow a concrete argument.
It's also pointless, since even if she would have to sell ownership shares in her company, that's not a problem to be protesting about in the first place, so you're asking me to justify how she wouldn't have to do a totally normal thing that wouldn't be objectionable if she did choose to do it. Maybe she would. I've always said that. You've never explained why that's a problem. Never even made an effort.
It was provided, $3 billion estimated value of the company, $3.6 billion net assets for her.
You have Warren's plan, which taxes at 2% from $50million- $1 billion, and 6% above that, annually.
So, let's see all those other options.
I have stated why, you just don't care.
- - - Updated - - -
I never said I was wealthy
Read this:
That's what Endus said. Respond to it.It's also pointless, since even if she would have to sell ownership shares in her company, that's not a problem to be protesting about in the first place, so you're asking me to justify how she wouldn't have to do a totally normal thing that wouldn't be objectionable if she did choose to do it. Maybe she would. I've always said that. You've never explained why that's a problem. Never even made an effort.
Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
Where the fuck did you ever get that Texas is my home state?
- - - Updated - - -
I did, it means that if there's no other options, that is exactly what he wants.... so there's no point in denying it.
He wans to force people to sell their companies.
Glad you finally agree with that assertion.
Clearly based on the first few paragraphs of the article this thread about is obvious that they are NOT paying their fair share. And besides, I literally asked you this question already and you didn't give me an answer. But at this point, I think I know why.
Proposals like what Warren or Sanders came up with already are good starting points because they address the issues of the rising wealth gap. How is it fair that these super wealthy people can get away with paying nothing? Based on the evidence presented in the article, that literally sounds like they're the definition of a leech in which the [someone] is the government or tax payer.In 2007, Jeff Bezos, then a multibillionaire and now the world’s richest man, did not pay a penny in federal income taxes. He achieved the feat again in 2011. In 2018, Tesla founder Elon Musk, the second-richest person in the world, also paid no federal income taxes.
Michael Bloomberg managed to do the same in recent years. Billionaire investor Carl Icahn did it twice. George Soros paid no federal income tax three years in a row.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/.../english/leechA leech is also a person who gets money or support from someone, giving little or nothing in return.
Looking for <Good Quotes for Signature>.