So if you think that these were some PR bullshit. They aren't. The devs are behind these changes, and their opinion = law.
https://twitter.com/ScarizardPlays/s...28884868489217
https://twitter.com/valentine_irl/st...19920815017986please read. been seeing a lot of (frankly upsetting) comments from people who follow me / ‘support devs’ about some of the updates to in-game content being a ‘smokescreen for distract from bigger issues’ when really… it’s being led from within, by people who care, a Lot
https://twitter.com/HamletEJ/status/...601093120?s=20As a developer on the WoW team, when I see people say “no one was asking for this,” that feels odd to me, because yes, someone did, we as devs asked for it. If you support the devs of games, please be aware that we also have opinions on inclusion in our games. -
https://twitter.com/HamletEJ/status/...690003482?s=20I don't want to (counterproductively) quote them, but someone also pointed out today that our whole twitter life lately has been wanting to avoid the attention of wow twitter (even more so than usual), which conflicts with wanting to talk about any of this
https://twitter.com/kenandstuff/stat...684021255?s=21Yeah I mean I avoid even talking about it here, but it has been just uncomfortable lately seeing it from people who I would generally expect to support pro-inclusivity changes
https://twitter.com/kenandstuff/stat...119283202?s=20I have to imagine many wow devs feel this way as well. - @kenandstuff, Senior Game Designer (Encounters), World of Warcraft, responding to the above tweet
https://twitter.com/kenandstuff/stat...009864217?s=20The way I see it is that "they" are two completely different groups of people. "They" in charge of company wide policy changes are not the "they" in charge of wow content changes. I agree there needs to be company changes, but that doesn't mean there can't be game changes
https://twitter.com/trulyaliem/statu...072785411?s=20I can say with certainty that these changes did not come from requests from the c-suite, these changes came from demands from wow devs
https://twitter.com/trulyaliem/statu...911025667?s=20imagine a world in which everyone agreed that the trash should be taken out but they get upset when you clean up the trash's residue afterwards. if you're going to clean up shit, get the lysol and disinfect. otherwise it still stinks. really don't understand people sometimes. -
Not a current employee but a former oneif it were intended as a smokescreen it would have been promoted. you only know this exists because someone went datamining. getting upset with team 2 because we have corporate overlords who won't listen to our v. reasonable collective demands is... a choice one could make, ok.
https://twitter.com/EmberFirehair/st...41365874593794
Let's be honest. This game has been taken hostage by a political, progressive cult on twitter. They do not care about criticism. Countless amount of people got blocked that merely stating disagreeing doesn't mean you don't support them.I love this. Honestly, I love ALL the changes. Many of them I remember writing down in a list of "if I could just change things that bugged me and made feel excluded/creeped out/gross over the years, it would be these." BUT I SUPER LOVE when it's adjusted to just make it equal.
Another word they throw around is the word inclusivity.
Which means that these changes were made by minority devs. Mostly trans individuals or other LGBTQ+ people and if you don't support them and shut up about their opinion, you're practically a nazi.
https://twitter.com/Gaiazelle/status...17813153894401
Does anyone know the definition of CRONYISM?Been seeing a lot of extremely lukewarm takes lately. If you want to support employees, shitting on initiatives they started (driven by many minority devs as well) to make the game they work on more inclusive is not a good way to do that.
CRONYISM:
This game is not going to survive this cult taking World of Warcraft hostage.Cronyism is the practice of partiality in awarding jobs and other advantages to friends or trusted colleagues, especially in politics and between politicians and supportive organizations. For instance, this includes appointing "cronies" to positions of authority, regardless of their qualifications; this is in contrast to meritocracy, in which appointments are made purely on qualification.
Cronyism exists when the appointer and the beneficiary (such as an appointee) are in social or business contact. Often, the appointer needs support in their own proposal, job or position of authority, and for this reason the appointer appoints individuals who will not try to weaken their proposals, vote against issues, or express views contrary to those of the appointer.
Politically, "cronyism" is derogatorily used to imply buying and selling favors, such as: votes in legislative bodies, as doing favors to organizations, giving desirable ambassadorships to exotic places, etc. Whereas cronyism refers to partiality to a partner or friend, nepotism is the granting of favour to relatives.
You can argue "a bloo bloo are you such a snowflake that you get upset about women being turned into fruit, or having a couple of emotes removed?"
But really, who is the one actually crying and trying to change 15 year old content having a BLOO BLOO over that? Why not let it stay up ya snowflake?