Yup, and even officially confirmed and we can even see parts of that with Awacs, and other intelligence-gathering planes, and high-altitude drones daily circling close to Ukraine. And obviously some aircrafts that we cannot see (as well as satellites).
However, there are claims it is delayed a few hours to make it "intelligence" and not "live targeting data".
An article on HIMARS o'clock and the effect it is having.
https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2022/...HIMARS-o-clock
There's also the other side to it, more familiar to anyone who's exposed to the Chinese propaganda. Yes, a fat portion of the stories is thick bullshit, and they know as well as anyone with half a brain that anyone with half a brain knows that. But that's also the point, you should not care about those who already know the plot, or at least some broad outlines of it. You want to gradually build up to the snowball of less intelligent. Your target audience never was those who know a bit, so why bother catering them.
I got it from DoD https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investi...aine-rcna18542
One of the reasons is that if the US would be seen as providing real-time targeting info, and not only intelligence, it could be seen as the US being actively involved in the war; and most people (OP excluded) don't want that.
Currently yes (possibly excluding covert ops - but they are covert so I don't know, and I don't expect anyone to tell the truth).
The closest is talk about sending special forces to guard the US embassy - https://edition.cnn.com/europe/live-...a0f968520e48e4
To be honest, I doubt that they will let the Ukrainians just fire HIMARS blindly for the heck of it. Those missiles are $150K a pop. There absolutely are special forces from NATO operating in Ukraine, and providing live targeting info as well as combat help.
Obviously they will stay away from the front lines, and will not participate in direct confrontations. But as long as the risk of getting captured is minimal, they can maintain plausible deniability if a few do get caught. They will likely say they are foreign combatants, and Russia will be happy to buy it, because admitting otherwise would mean war.
The occasion is too good to pass on training your troops, and testing your equipment against a real 'modern' army. The investment is worth so much more. And when you pay $150K to destroy a $2M tank from the enemy without getting directly involved, it is a great investment.
Regardless of the outcome of this war for the Ukrainians or the Russians, the fact is that Russia is losing a lot of military capacity and equipment, while the US are testing theirs at a very low cost. The more this drags on, the more the US and NATO are 'winning'.
why would they be firing blind? Ukraine has their own intelligence and scouts for live data from the ground to hit troop positions and large ammo dumps don't exactly move every few hours.
if they were storing thousands of rounds of artillery ammo somewhere yesterday, they will still be storing them there today and you can fire a missile at it.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Reportedly Russia is going to be buying hundreds of drones, including armed ones, from Iran.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...ussia-00045195
I recently started wondering if, given the food crisis and its future consequences, Putin will at some point borrow Erdogan's and Lukashenko's playbook and start weaponizing mass refugee waves. Obvious easy targets would be Finland and the Baltic States, but with sufficient resource allocation he could technically target Canada and the US as well.
- - - Updated - - -
AFAIK the Iranians, trough their Houti proxies, were the first to pioneer long range drone swarm attacks.
"It is every citizen's final duty to go into the tanks, and become one with all the people."
~ Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang, "Ethics for Tomorrow"
I think Putin has more important things to worry about, relatively speaking, than whether he can manipulate countries whose politics he has no say in over a crisis he can't affect affirmative control of in any real fashion a few years down the line to hopefully affect some result not actually directly related to the country he's at war with but instead to indirectly pressure countries that he's not directly fighting into not giving as much aid to a country he IS fighting... so that he can take it over and hopefully the food resumes flowing?
Like, you know, getting personnel and equipment into a country right next to his, which he seems to be having a tough time doing.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Russian deputies have been called back from holidays for a special session of the Duma on Friday - and you know how politicians hate their numerous holidays interrupted.
Lot of speculation as to what for. The gherkin is hoping it means a formally declaration of war and mass mobilisation though most don't think putler will go that far yet.
https://twitter.com/mdmitri91/status...IDSyD6j2pAacnw
Other options are to do with the economic woes, a formal annexation of occupied lands or issuing Ukraine an ultimatum to surrender 'or else.'
I'm guessing Russia feels pressured to keep up, for domestic policy reasons. They expected a quick and dirty win, and got fucked for it. Russia absolutely couldn't handle a humiliating defeat, is what I think is the thought process.
Something something sunk cost fallacy, losing face...