I'm sure someone said at some point that Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania will never join NATO.
I'm sure someone said at some point that Sweden and Finland will never join NATO, they're thinking about it now.
And you say Ukraine will never join NATO.
You must know something no one else does.
Because Russia is historically known for fucking up the countries it occupies? It's REALLY hard to give them the benefit of the doubt considering their track record.
And even if you ignore the Russian history, just look at the methods used during this invasion: shelling cities, deliberately targeting civilians, mining humanitarian corridors... Did Russia provide any option other than "we behave like war criminals and we can't be trusted"?
Last edited by Barzotti; 2022-03-22 at 02:29 PM.
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania joined NATO when Russia was in the gutter of 1998 and was no threat whatsoever.
Big difference.
BTW this is Zelensky on NATO: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/news-6...yz3A6x5uAsyY3c
BBC Ukraine - can translate. Legit from the horse's mouth.
Last edited by Barzotti; 2022-03-22 at 02:35 PM.
So, you try acting smug by talking about concentration camps. I give you three separate links to refute your claim. You handwave them because "it's totally not like that! this concentration camp is totally not a concentration camp!" Well, here you go to the ignore list.
I am sure this is all the while Ukrainians are Netflix chilling with a bowl of popcorn and cool cans of soda.
You just don't get it - Russian costs are huge, but Ukrainian costs are enormous. Russians pain is economy, Ukrainian pain is their cities being dusted, people dying by thousands and running away by millions.
In this game of whose costs are insurmountably higher, it's plain simple - Ukraine "wins".
Here is the thing, NATO is not an economic agreement, i think everyone knows that, though it does encourage friendly economic and trading relationship between members. But, safety and stability does help a country to develop its economy, and NATO provide that.
For exemple, investing billions of dollars in Ukraine building manufacture plants or oil refinery, even before the war, was a risky venture. Ukraine alone cannot guaranty its safety and, if Russia seize or destroy the plant, investors stand to lose billions.
Contrast this with country like the Baltic country. The relative safety provided by NATO, can and does attract foreign investments. Lithuania GDP increase 500% in the last 20 years.
There is a link between safety and prosperity.
Nice goalpost shifting. We've gone from "can you provide any evidence that Russia is running concentration camps" to "well they're no different from the concentration camps used by most authoritarian regimes".
I really don't get what you think you're accomplishing here by carrying water for the Kremlin like this.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Since you can't tell the difference one is a dictatorship arresting anyone who speaks against them the other is arresting people because of their race or religious belief regardless of their actions. Russia isn't rounding up every Ukrainian in those territories to march them to the gas chamber.
Oh, don't get it twisted; they know perfectly well what a concentration camp is because they've acknowledged as such regarding the Trump administration's own use of concentration camps against asylum seekers.
Which is why it's baffling to me that they feel the need to excuse the Kremlin.
Last edited by Elegiac; 2022-03-22 at 02:49 PM.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Neither did the Nazis to start with. You also seem to be unaware that said camps were also used for political dissidents, as well as that one of the Kremlin's stated policy positions being that a distinct Ukrainian identity is a post-Soviet aberration that needs 'correction'.
Again, not sure what you think you're accomplishing here.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi