You know, you could take the time, while ignoring this tv circus, and read some of the past articles, about what amber accused JD of and how this case revealed that her lies started 6 years ago when filing for the restraining order.
Here have a read
6yo wapo article
some highlights:
"Heard, 30, who filed for divorce from Depp last week, accused the 52-year-old actor of repeated domestic violence. The filing was apparently fueled by an alleged incident on May 21 at Depp’s home, in which the Los Angeles police were called to a domestic dispute.
Heard declined to press charges, and, according to the Associated Press, the cops determined “a crime did not occur.”
“Amber did not provide a statement to the LAPD in an attempt to protect her privacy and Johnny’s career,” Heard’s attorneys Samantha Spector and Joseph Koenig said in a statement. “In domestic violence cases, it is not unusual for the perpetrator’s playbook to include miscasting the victim as the villain.”
The attorneys reiterate that Heard wanted to keep everything private and that it was a third party who called the police to Depp’s apartment on May 21. They say the cops indeed saw “physical injuries” to Heard’s face. And, the lawyers add, Heard purposefully did not serve Depp with divorce papers until after his premiere of “Alice Through the Looking Glass,” two days later, and filed the restraining order when he was already out of the country.
“In reality, Amber acted no differently than many victims of domestic violence, who think first of the harm that might come to the abuser, rather than the abuse they have already suffered,” they wrote, adding that Heard wants to give Los Angeles police an opportunity to conduct “an accurate and complete investigation” into what happened that night.""
and here's what the police had to say about it back then:
"“On May 21, 2016, officers responded to a domestic incident radio call…” LAPD Sgt. Marlon Marrache says. “The person reporting the crime [Heard] did not insist on a report and no report was warranted. There was no evidence of any crime. A crime did not occur so the officers left the scene and left a business card.”
Marrache adds that if there had been any signs of abuse, officers would have conducted an investigation, regardless of what Heard said had happened."
So AH wanted to give the police time to investigate while also keeping the police from investigating which wouldn't have worked anyway because the police would've investigated regardless if they had reason to believe a crime occurred.
Some tidbits, JDs mother died may 20th 2016, and his daughters birthday is on may 27th, so the alleged abuse the police found no evidence for happened the day after his mother died and AH filed the restraining order on his daughters birthday. What a wonderful person.
Oh and since I am not sure if you know this because why would you, the wapo oped came 2 years prior to the sun article. So the article was based on the claims in the wapo oped, you know the one that according to you had no influence on anything whatsoever. Fun fact the incident on may 21st wasn't part of the 14 alleged assaults that were part of the UK trial, neither was the part when he cut his finger off and violently attacked her with a bottle.