The type of people that are meta-slaves to reviews do, I suppose.
Review websites are usually big broad strokes and are good for what they are meant to do - see Twilight, as example, IMDB is rating it 5ish. I find that accurate - it's not to give you personally tailored stats.
A way to battle that specific problem is entirely up to the user - find reviewers that you are aware that align with your personal tastes and, if you really are bothered to look for a review/rating on something, take theirs opinion into consideration.
--
Adding an image. And bloody hell, if Twilight (for all it's flaws) isn't a good example for my original premise on this thread lol
Lots of review bombing. The movie clearly isn't a mudpile of worthlessness.
Lots of review bloating. The movie cleary isn't a masterpiece for the ages.
It averages at.. mediocre.
There's a very specific type pf media that isn't worried about Review Bombing.
Looking at a Marvel-only score list and, generally:
Marvel: Endgame wasn't worried about it.
Iron Man wasn't worried about it.
Guardians of the Galaxy wasn't worried about it.
Thor: Love and Thunder was worried about it though...