Horde out number Alli on all battle groups both US & EUR but 1, & thats Nightfall US.

[warjin]

http://www.crunchywow.com/population/pop_EU_bgs.html

So much for Pvp balance.

[Attaxor]

Doesnt this mean instant queues for alliance?

[Xiun]

Since I started WoW, I've played on nightfall US.

I never knew what a long que was, what it was like to win all day.

/sob

It's tough bein' a hordie! Granted, I never enter a BG without at least 2 other people from my guild with me + heals.

Ally dominated or not, people are retarded in PuG BGs

[warjin]

Doesnt this mean instant queues for alliance?

Yes but a extream uphill battle in Alli RBG Wins, not only that the Q for the Horde is unreal, I wait 30 mins to do a BG.

[Spectrez]

All I have to say is - reroll.

For the Horde!!! <3

[Kaleid]

Who ever said PvP was balanced? It never will be balanced unless they completely separate it from PvE. This includes talents, spells, abilities and gear.

[Oweena]

I'm confused here and don't exactly get your point?

You're complaining that the battlegroups aren't equally set?
You're complaining that horde have better players?
You're complaining that horde are better PvP races?

[Ruski]

he's complaining just to complain it seems

[idolized]

When the game first released Alliance dominated all most every server, cause of the NE race. TBC came out and introduced BE everyone switched to the "better" looking race and there for Horde dominate now. When Cataclysm comes everyone is gonna reroll/faction change to play Worgen and then it will be back to Alliance domination.

[Aqua]

Yep and the whole of Emerald Dream EU 'Tries' to balance out the 'Blackout' Alliance Battlegroup. Which really sucks for us hordies server wise :P

17,000 Alliance to 2,500 horde ftw!

[Undeadprotoss]

Really warjjin?

[mordale]

with the bg servers being fused by sector this means quick ques for alliance.
RBG will be the same for both sides since you can go HvsH or AvsA.
bad day to be a red shirt.

[Deleted]

YEAH! Hes the Racial guy, he belives that horde/ally player balance is affected by racials

[Xiun]

When the game first released Alliance dominated all most every server, cause of the NE race. TBC came out and introduced BE everyone switched to the "better" looking race and there for Horde dominate now. When Cataclysm comes everyone is gonna reroll/faction change to play Worgen and then it will be back to Alliance domination.

Not even.

Alliance used to have more players overall, but horde dominated pvp.

BC introduced BEs, and horde got more players overall, and their supriority in PvP started to dwindle.

It seems in the last few months, with EMFH, horde seems to have lost a lot of the "pro" pvpers, and is left with the crummy alliance x-fers who came for an easy win.

[Simca]

YEAH! Hes the Racial guy, he belives that horde/ally player balance is affected by racials

Not just affected by racials. He believes the ONLY difference between the Horde and Alliance is racials.

Somewhere out there, there is another dcemuser. He's playing a dwarf paladin right now, crying violently because his racial is underpowered and he has identical gear and skill to me, but can never win.

I feel bad for him.

---------- Post added 2010-09-30 at 11:24 PM ----------

Not even.

Alliance used to have more players overall, but horde dominated pvp.

BC introduced BEs, and horde got more players overall, and their supriority in PvP started to dwindle.

It seems in the last few months, with EMFH, horde seems to have lost a lot of the "pro" pvpers, and is left with the crummy alliance x-fers who came for an easy win.

I agree completely. It seems like the side with the higher population loses tons more, at least to me. My BG win rate is somewhere between 30-40% at the moment.

[Deleted]

I'm confused here and don't exactly get your point?

You're complaining that the battlegroups aren't equally set?
You're complaining that horde have better players?
You're complaining that horde are better PvP races?

Of course the battlegrounds aren't equally set, they've never been equally set. I'm on Cyclone (EU) and out of the 6 PvP servers in the group, 5 of them are massively dominated by the horde. One of them is 94% horde.

Better players? Keep dreamin'
Better races? Widely accepted and one that smacks of just a little bit more than bias imo.

He does have a point and one that even with the most cursory glance shows that the whole Battlegroup idea is a deck dealt from the bottom of the pack.

[Simca]

Of course the battlegrounds aren't equally set, they've never been equally set. I'm on Cyclone (EU) and out of the 6 PvP servers in the group, 5 of them are massively dominated by the horde. One of them is 94% horde.

Better players? Keep dreamin'
Better races? Widely accepted and one that smacks of just a little bit more than bias imo.

He does have a point and one that even with the most cursory glance shows that the whole Battlegroup idea is a deck dealt from the bottom of the pack.

If they've got better races, why was the Horde underplayed at a 60-40 ratio in Vanilla?

Answer: Blood Elves.

[Deleted]

YEAH! Hes the Racial guy, he belives that horde/ally player balance is affected by racials

Okie Dokie... lets take the 'AoE silence' off of the bledelf... see how that goes down in the horde community shall we? Or should we remove the 'cannibalize' ability too? Or the 'everyman for himself' one from humans? Fact is racials DO play a big part for all pvp'ers and have advantages and disadvantages for all races.

[Organoth]

http://www.crunchywow.com/population/pop_EU_bgs.html

So much for Pvp balance.

This means nothing, BGs have limits to the numbers of players on each side so the Horde just sits in que longer. Also, just because a server has more players of a certain faction does not mean all of those players even take part in PvP. If your arguement had any weight the Horde would win every BG, which they don't.

[tamlus]

They outnumber us but cant beat us, horde control WG on my sever but at one time the horde side of the battlegroup boycotted AV because we beat them so bad. =-) Alliance ftw