When they are contradictory and often disproved by real evidence, no they do not.
Historical data is typically reinforced by some sort of hard evidence. For example, the evidence that an army passed from point A to point B, or the introduction of a civilization from nation A to nation B.
Furthermore, historical accuracy is never 100%, and this is accepted.
If some evidence comes along to disprove a once-held belief, then that evidence is taken into consideration, and the 'historical record' is then rewritten.
These are the fundamental differences between historical accuracy and 'believing in the bible'.