Happy
ANGRY
Where's the "meh" section?
I don't do arenas, nor do I hate them (I'm just not interested) so I probably wouldn't care.
Putin khuliyo
Yea, I apologize, I am not going to say I kept track of viable specs very well over my length of PvPing, but the main point I was trying to draw is that most class specs did at one point in time or another get buffed or nerfed due to PvP reasons, I just am bad at giving some solid examples as my memory is starting to get fuzzy after being off WoW for more than a year now.
And yes, I know firsthand how bad rets were in Cataclysm, I played one :P pissed me off more than enough. I do remember that offhealing was ridiculous though with selfless healer.
Fod Sparta los wuth, ahrk okaaz gekenlok kruziik himdah, dinok fent kos rozol do daan wah jer do Samos. Ahrk haar do Heracles fent motaad, fah strunmah vonun fent yolein ko yol.
You do know that blizzard is starting to actually nerf damage in a manner of nerfing it when used on players, right?
I'd be pretty pissed. It was already a shame they removed skirmishes (never played them due to being a lowbie back in wotlk, but the idea sounded extremely convenient), but if they were to remove the actual arenas.. Idk what would happen to WoW. I'd be pretty certain WoW would lose a good amount of players.
i dont play anymore but when i did thats basically all i ever cared about, so i would have to vote id be upset. that being said and possibly a little off topic but im not entirely sure why people think it would be a good idea. you would essentially being taking away things players can do in a time when their goal is to add things players can do so it seems a little counterproductive.
I do arenas once a week for the cap and I don't like them so much, but so many stupid statements over here so...
-If they wanted a only pve game they would have introduced only one faction. World pvp was their main objective at launch and they succeed so much that the servers could not handle it so they had to instance it. Holy shit they designed a great RPG not a pve or pvp focused one, because the vanilla pvp was not just an accident.
-If they had not introduced arenas they would not have introduced flying mounts to avoid hurting world pvp among other things.
-Some pve players changes their spec for a stupid 1k dps increase on a dummie or a noob's post on the forums while they dont understand that every fight is different. It is not arenas fault if you do lees damage than others.
Last edited by Wirzy; 2013-01-03 at 04:39 AM.
Wouldn't care much. I only played Arena during TBC where I got the Challenger rank (You can make fun of me now, that seems to be the new thing) and shortly in Wotlk. Never touched it during late Wotlk and there after. If no Arena would result in a more interesting
BG system (Maps, reward, design etc) I would be all for it, but I know it will never happen.
Remember, my opinion.
Were u interrupting and stunning the shaman are just rolling ur face across the keyboard hoping for a quick kill.
You're right except for 2 things.
1. My name is spelt "God" not "Loucious-sama".
2. I'm not a man, because man is inherently flawed. I am in fact a being so far beyond your comprehension that archaic constraints like flesh, blood, time and consequently, gender, have no meaning to me.
Wow... more than 50% would be happy if they were removed. Thats crazy, its not an entirely representative sample but if this was the case for the whole WoW community Blizzard could spend less resources on something only half of the community cares about and spend em in something they do.
Arenas are nothing but a guessing game anyways, and in sense a matter of luck. Thats all it is.
Call me House.
the easiest way to fix the pvp vs. pve discussion is to just bite the bullet and seperate the way ALL abilities/spells work between pve and pvp. ive read that they dont want to do this because its time consuming, but it would finally keep people from claiming "pve suffers because of pvp" and "pvp suffers because of pve".
the unfortunate downside to this, is if its true and it takes them awhile to seperate spells/abilities then people would bitch and complain that they spent too much time on that and not enough time on pve content, pvp content. despite the fact its something the game desperately needs
They are far from a matter of luck and the same can be said about a lot of pve fights finding bugs for world first and such.
---------- Post added 2013-01-03 at 04:40 AM ----------
name some this expansion?
You're right except for 2 things.
1. My name is spelt "God" not "Loucious-sama".
2. I'm not a man, because man is inherently flawed. I am in fact a being so far beyond your comprehension that archaic constraints like flesh, blood, time and consequently, gender, have no meaning to me.
It would never happen because Blizzard doesn't listen to ignorant haters and remove good content just because some people don't like it and can't stop QQing about it on the forums.
---------- Post added 2013-01-03 at 05:02 AM ----------
No, they don't want to do it because they want the game to feel like the same game whether it's PVE or PVP. And they want your character to feel the same as well.
i cant really rack my brain around how it could be interesting farming the same scripted content for how many months
sure pve is fun but doesnt it get boring doing the same old thing ...same fight ...press this button ...stand over here... run overthere ... loot the boss ... profit??
pvp is always changing and its always a challenge the difference between a low rated arena player and a high rated arena player other then knowledge is a high rated arena player makes no mistakes and knows how to capitalise on mistakes that i see's people make ...
i always think about arena like advance chess ... you know what all the pieces do but what the player does is his own thing