Originally Posted by
Pipostylor
No, as i said, if someone asks you how class X is and you just tell them about all the advantages it's not very informative. Any class would seem to be the best if you only list the advantages.
Sorry, but at this point I even have to ask if you play a monk yourself, because what you write isn't just a bit wrong, it's like as wrong as it gets. Dematerialize doesn't counter stuns used as a cc. It doesn't reduce the stun, it just makes you invulnerable for a short period of time after a stun which is good for your survivability but doesn't do anything as regard to cc.
Nimble Brew would be the first anti cc for a monk, but it's not yet in the game.
Ring of Peace, disarm and your melee interrupt are not usable while you are cced, so they are no anti cc tools.
Diffuse magic only reflects debuffs on you and can only be used while you are NOT cced, so that's no anti cc tool as well.
Zen Meditation isn't an anti cc as well.
"You name it and a monk can get out of it"? You can't get out of anything except for using a insignia/human racial or using will of the forsaken as undead. So I have to ask again: Do you even play a healmonk?
In RBG you could at least argue if a healmonk is better than a resto shaman (even though most people will tell you that a shaman is better due to tremor, grounding, shock etc.), but especially in 3on3 arena (which many people consider the most important bracket) a shaman is flat out better than a healmonk and its not even close. You are free to go over to the armory and look at whatever battlegroup you like and compare where resto shamans and healmonks are as regard to rating.