If corpses, why not animals? What consent can one give versus the other? Wasn't OT recently graced with the thread involving a couple attempting to overturn Germany's ban on bestiality?
But ya I agree and would hope sex with kiddos remains illegal, although unfortunately pedos are attempting to find legal loopholes to child pornography :/
I would agree that corpses and animals are more or less on the same moral level. Which is to say, it's really pushing the boundaries. Willing to have sex with a corpse or an animal in indicative of sociopathic traits. I could see disallowing both on the same grounds that we think torturing animals is wrong.
People arguing that pedophilia and bestiality is fine now too in addition to this. See what I talk about earlier?
I thought there was actual science or something showing inbreeding is not so hot for bloodlines or did I miss something?
Do you want more King Joffry's? Cause thats how you get more King Joffry's.
The pendulum swings both ways, but generally towards freedom. If it's an integral part of human nature, it will become socially permissible. Maybe not within the next hundred years. But eventually.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes and no. You get more defects. You get more people that aren't carriers. Via incest you can remove deleterious alleles from a population. The cost is a higher incidence of defects - temporarily.
In the long run, incest is a good thing.
No, you can perfectly see what happened here, I said it would go this way and it happened.No, because you were and still are just talking out of your ass
As if it's some great cataclysm.
- - - Updated - - -
Maybe. Maybe not. Civil rights have changed drastically over the last few decades. And technology has developed to the point where we can start to consider therapies for aging. It could happen in 50 years, or we could live thousands. I think it's worth considering.
you know what i mean lol, also seen some really pretty ones sucking horses.
and go google if you wanna know why it's wrong to look at kids sexually. all kinds of psychological shit, the physical damage it can cause. all kinds of stuff. i'm not a doctor, i can't name everything wrong with it off hand. but to me, this is the one moral case that stands above all others, one of three moral codes humanity should stand by "you don't fuck kids".
I totally agree that it's from the same school of thought. They do differ though, and more than a little. Just like how socialism isn't the same as communism, not even by a longshot, even though it's from the same school of thought.
Edit: A good local example would be the Leftist Party and the Socialdemocrats. Same school of thought, and they even originate from the same party - yet, the Socialdemocrats arguably would both want to, and have an easier time with, collaborating with parties to the centre-right rather than with the Leftist Party.
Last edited by Sama-81; 2016-02-23 at 12:32 AM.
Yeah, and this is a textbook case on where freedom needs to be denied, necrophila should be globally permanently banned with specific writing so it can never ever be overturned even if 100% of all humans on earth support it.
You have to think in the terms of your own sexuality. You have no control over what attracts you and stimulates you sexually. Pedophiles are no different, they are not making a conscious choice to be attracted to children. Thus the only wrong thing is the wrong processing in certain parts of the brain. Pedophiles are just kids in adult clothing. It must be incredibly tough to live a life like that. I pity them.
What can be argued to be wrong however, is acting upon those desires even after understanding the potential damaging effect it may have.
This got me thinking. If someone is undead, is it still necrophilia. Like, assume we can bring back someone who's been dead for... let's say 6+ hours (since that's essentially impossible right now), and they're completely mentally there, no brain damage.